MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968283506 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14591294

D2.3 Intelligent operations systems and new technologies for intermodal logistics optimization

2024· article· en· W6968283506 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransport and Logistics Innovations
Canadian institutionsTransport Canada
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsSustainabilityDeliverableSupply chainResilience (materials science)European unionHumanitarian LogisticsTask (project management)Intelligent transportation systemEmerging technologies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present report is the Deliverable from task 2.3 of the ADMIRAL – Advanced Marketplace for Low Emission and Energy Transportation project, funded by the European Union under the HORIZON-CL5-2022-D6-02 with Grant Number 101104163.ADMIRAL WP2 – Sustainable development of logistics & transportation addresses key sustainability issues in the transportation and logistics sector such as zero (low) emissions logistics, reduction of energy consumption from fossil fuels in transportation and enhancement of collaborative logistics to reach common sustainability goals in the pilots to be implemented in Finland, Lithuania, Portugal-Spain and Slovenia-Croatia.The present report «Intelligent operations systems and new technologies for intermodal logistics optimization » is one result of task 2.3 - Current (mega) trends for sustainable logistics, which integrates ADMIRAL WP2 - Sustainable development of logistics & transport. Following ADMIRAL’s project Grant Agreement 101104163, the main goals of task 2.3 are as follows: • To identify global trends on innovative solutions to improve the sustainability performance of operations (Reverse logistics, Symbiotic logistics, etc.).• To identify how companies/stakeholders are dealing with identified technological changes and adapting systems for digitalisation, automation and the creation of new services (IoT, autonomous delivery, robotics, circular supply chains, etc.).• To analyse how the requirements for improving resilience and sustainability at the same time are considered and should be considered in the future.• To identify/assess how intelligent systems are being used or planned to integrate all logistics stakeholders (producers, suppliers, ship owners, transport operators, support services, etc.), including sustainability performance indicators.• To analyse how governance practices connect all levels of suppliers and service providers considering code of conduct and corporate reports to achieve sustainability goals.• To map innovative solutions, technological and social, identifying the contribution of each for a more efficient and sustainable supply chain (e.g., autonomous vehicles and delivery, factory ships with product finishing (customization), including industry 5.0 issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicTransport and Logistics InnovationsFrench-language works237,207