Bibliographic record
Abstract
103 Euura acuminalis (Vikberg, 1982) Fig. 335 Pteronidea acuminata Lindqvist, 1968: 194–195. Secondary homonym of E. acuminata Enslin, 1915 [E. purpureae (Cameron, 1884)]. Nematus acuminalis Vikberg, 1982. Replacement name for P. acuminata. Diagnosis Only the two type specimens were available for study. The holotype male (4.7 mm) is rather pale and has a relatively distinctive penis valve that cannot be associated with any other species of Euura. The studied female paratype is more or less the same colour, but conspecificity with the male is uncertain. Holotype male ventrally pale (also antenna slightly); dorsally black, except last 2–3 terga (6 th slightly); head extensively pale around eyes; hind tibia nearly completely pale; hind tarsi mostly black or brown; pterostigma yellow or brown; claws bifid; projection of tergite 8 longer than broad, rather distinct; antenna long. The female is externally most similar to that of striatipleuris (synonymised here with E. fuscarima), particularly paratypes GL.3547 and GL.3548, but saw may be more similar to that of E. poppii which may also have similar colouration. Placement in the bipartita group is uncertain. Type material examined Holotype Pteronidea acuminata SWEDEN – Torne Lappmark • ♂; Torneträsk; 68.22° N, 19.74° E; 400 m a.s.l.; R. Malaise leg.; NHRS, NHRS-HEVA000003990. Paratype Pteronidea acuminata SWEDEN – Torne Lappmark • 1 ♀; same data as for holotype; NHRS, NHRS-HEVA000003991. Host plants Unknown. Genetics COI No data. Nuclear No data. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Sweden.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.043 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".