Bibliographic record
Abstract
OOCTONUS Haliday, 1833 (Figs 231–235) Ooctonus Haliday, 1833a: 268, 1833b: 343. Type species: Ooctonus insignis Haliday, 1833, by subsequent designation by Westwood, 1839: 78. See Huber et al. (2020) for the generic synonym and its type species. Diagnosis. Face without subantennal sulcus ventral to each torulus (Fig. 231a); funicle 8-segmented (Fig. 232); pronotum entire (Fig. 234); fore wing with hypochaeta next to proximal macrochaeta (Fig. 233); propodeum with diamond-like pattern of carinae, the incomplete median carina, costulae and plicae, defining a central pentagonal areole and, sublaterally, several (usually 4) submedian areoles (Fig. 234); petiole distinctly longer than wide (Fig. 235a,b). Remarks. Ooctonus belongs to the Ooctonus group of genera. In the Neotropical region it is the only genus in the group. Although Ooctonus was traditionally placed near the Gonatocerus group of genera it superficially resembles several genera in the Polynema group except for the obvious difference in number of funicle and tarsal segments (Huber 2013b). The position of the hypochaeta — close to the proximal macrochaeta — is more similar to members of the Polynema group than to members of the Gonatocerus group. The combination of 8-segmented funicle in females and presence of plicae and costulae on the propodeum are unique. Neotropical hosts. Unknown. Important reference. Huber (2013b).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".