Pilophorus pseudoperplexus Josifov 1987
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pilophorus pseudoperplexus Josifov, 1987 (Figs 2C ̅D, 11C, 12C–E, 19G̅I) Pilophorus pseudoperplexus Josifov, 1987: 118 (n. sp., desc.); Schuh, 2002 –2013, online catalog; Aukema, 2018, online catalog; Urayama et al. 2019: 81, fig. 2D (faunal list); Yamamoto & Yasunaga, 2020: 81 (faunal list). Material examined. JAPAN: Hokkaido, Otaru City, Estuary of Shinkawa River, 43.165, 141.227, Quercus dentata, 9 Sep 2007, A. Yamamoto, 2♀ (OMO). Honshu: Kanagawa Pref., Atsugi City, TUA-farm, 22 Jun 1999, S. Nagashima, 3♂ 1♀ (TUA). Kyushu: Nagasaki City, Yotsue Town, Agri-Hills Park, 32.81037, 129.79333, Quercus acutissima Carruth. (Fagaceae), 17 Jun 2017, T. Yasunaga, 2 ♂ (TYCN) (AMNH _PBI 00380671). Shikoku, Kochi Pref., Same’ura-dam, 33.755, 133.548, Quercus accutissima, 24 Jul 1996, T. Yasunaga, 2 ♀ (TYCN). Rediagnosis. Recognized by its moderate size; dark reddish brown general coloration; almost linear antennal segment II that is weakly clavate; nearly straight metatibia; C-shaped endosoma with bifurcate median process (its shorter branch tiny, Fig. 11C); sclerotized ring with a developed rim dorsally (Fig. 12C); and vestibular sclerite with a conical projection left-laterally (Fig. 12D). Measurements. See Table 2. Biology. This oak-inhabiting mirid is known to be associated mainly with deciduous Quercus species (Kerzhner, 1988; Urayama et al., 2019) and assumed to have a univoltine life cycle. The adults were found from mid-June to late July in warm temperate climate zone. Discussion. See discussion under P. erraticus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".