Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tesserodon gestroi Van Lansberge, 1885 Tesserodon gestroi Van Lansberge, 1885: 375–376. Name-bearing type: Male holotype by monotypy in the Museo Civico di Storia Naturale Giacomo Doria, Genoa, Italy (Matthews 1974; Storey 1991; Alberto Ballerio, personal communication to MC, 22 March 2025). Type locality: Somerset, Cape York, Queensland, Australia (Van Lansberge 1885; Matthews 1974; Storey 1991). Remarks: Even though Van Lansberge (1885) mentioned no numbers, both Matthews (1974) and Storey (1991) assumed the type series to be composed of a single specimen, the holotype by monotypy. Since the content of Van Lansberge’s description is not inconsistent with such a possibility—e.g., it states a precise figure for body size, “Long. 8 millim.”—we do not dispute this interpretation. This material, according to Van Lansberge, was collected in Somerset, at the northernmost tip of Cape York, by Luigi d’Albertis. Horn et al. (1990a) do not inform the whereabouts of the Australian material gathered by d’Albertis, but it is fair to assume it was deposited in the Genoa Museum like the specimens from the Malay Archipelago were said to have been by the authors. This was Matthews’ assumption too; unfortunately, however, he did not manage to see the gestroi holotype in person. Storey (1991) did and confirmed it to be in Genoa; nevertheless, he realized that Matthews had misidentified the species in his Australian scarabaeine treatise: gestroi sensu Matthews was a new species Storey described as T. erratum, whereas the real gestroi had not been seen by Matthews. According to Storey, the gestroi holotype was collected by d’Albertis in January 1875, presumably based on label information. Distribution: Northern Cape York Peninsula, Queensland, Australia (Storey 1991; Atlas of Living Australia 2024).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.061 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".