Cybaeus coylei Bennett & Copley & Copley 2021, spec. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cybaeus coylei Bennett spec. nov. Figs 8–10, 13–15, 41 Type material. Holotype male. U.S.A.: California: Tuolumne County ¸ Pinecrest, 10.9.1959, W.J. Gertsch & V. D. Roth (AMNH). Paratype. U.S.A.: California: Tuolumne. 1♀, Pinecrest, 10.9.1959, W.J. Gertsch & V. D. Roth (AMNH). Etymology. The specific name is a patronym honouring arachnid ethologist and systematist Frederick A. Coyle, a valued friend and early mentor who guided Robb Bennett through his initial graduate work and with whom he experienced memorable road and field trips; name in genitive case. Diagnosis. Cybaeus coylei spec. nov. is grouped with C. aspenicolens and C. blasbes in the informal aspenicolens subgroup. Distinguishing the aspenicolens and fraxineus subgroups is discussed in the aspenicolens species group diagnosis. The male of C. coylei spec. nov. is diagnosed by the relatively smoothly curved retrolateral margin of the massive, blunt patellar apophysis with about 2 dozen very small peg setae dorsally (Figs 8, 13) as well as the strong dorsal deflection of the tip of the proximal arm of the tegular apophysis (Fig. 10) such that much of the proximal arm is hidden in ventral view (Fig. 9). The female of C. coylei spec. nov. is diagnosed primarily by the form of the epigynum (Fig. 14) which lacks any significant sclerotization and the relatively inconspicuous epigynal depression with a weakly defined anterior margin. Diagnostic differences distinguishing other species of the aspenicolens subgroup from specimens of C. coylei spec. nov. are discussed under C. aspenicolens. Description. Ventral tibia I macrosetae: 2–1p–2–1p– 1p. Male: (n=1). About 40 or 50 stout peg setae retrolaterally on massive, blunt patellar apophysis; about two dozen very small peg setae dorsally (Figs 8, 13). Proximal arm of tegular apophysis (Figs 9–10) strongly deflected dorsally; large, broad, retrolaterally uncinate with tip weakly corkscrewed. Measurements. Holotype CL 3.3, CW 2.43, SL 1.55, SW 1.50. Female: (n=1). Atrium (Fig. 14) with paired unobscured openings; epigynal depression poorly developed, not strongly bordered anteriorly. Vulval ducts (Fig. 15) contiguous from posterior end of copulatory ducts nearly to location of Bennett’s glands, apparently not joined anteriorly. Measurements. CL 3.4, CW 2.35, SL 1.55, SW 1.48. Distribution. Known only from the type locality on the western flank of the southern Sierra Nevada in Tuolumne County (Fig. 41).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.342 | 0.052 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".