Dysagrionites Archibald & Cannings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dysagrionites sp. B Fig. 64. Material. RBCM P1554 (Fig. 64), the proximal half of a wing, damaged, apparently torn along or near RP3-4, which is missing or obscured. Collected at Driftwood Canyon Provincial Park by SBA, 10.viii.2002, housed in the Royal British Columbia Museum collections. Description of RBCM P1554. A somewhat damaged proximal portion of a wing. Length, width undeterminable by preservation. As in diagnosis and the following. Crossveins in postnodal, postsubnodal spaces aligned in preserved region. IR1 originates two, maybe three cells distal to origin of RP2. RP2 originates 2.5 cells distal to origin of IR2. IR2 originates at subnodus. RP3-4 is missing, wing damaged. MA linear to level of origin of IR1, not preserved distal to this. MP linear, rather straight from quadrangle to level of origin of IR2, not preserved distal to this. CuA slightly zigzagged distal to level of subnodus, little preserved distal to this. CuA–A space at least three cells wide by level of subnodus, at least two briefly proximal to this. Range and age. Okanagan Highlands shale at Driftwood Canyon Provincial Park, British Columbia, Canada; mid-Ypresian. Discussion. This damaged proximal half of a wing may be separated from those of other species of Dysagrioninae except Primorilestes madseni by infuscate membrane probably from the level of Ax1 (possibly proximal to this?) to the furthest preserved potion distal to the origin of IR1. The portion preserved is most easily distinguished from P. madseni by being narrower between the quadrangle and the posterior margin.Although it is distinct by these traits, we do not name this species by the very damaged and incomplete condition of its only known fossil. It is of particular interest as the only known odonate fossil of the Okanagan Highlands from Driftwood Canyon, indeed, the only one north of McAbee, some 600 kilometres to the southeast of Driftwood Canyon Provincial Park.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".