Alisalia elongata Klimaszewski & Webster 2009, sp. n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
3. Alisalia elongata Klimaszewski & Webster, sp. n. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 6BF0ADCC-3600-4FA9-A087-0CB08017CA2B Figs 4, 19–22, Map 3 HOLOTYPE (male): CANADA, New Brunswick, Queens Co., Bayard, at Nerepis River, 45.4426°N, 66.3280°W, 30.V.2008, R.P. Webster, coll., river margin, un- der small rocks in gravel (LFC) 1 male. PARATYPE: labelled as the holotype (RWC) 1 male. Etymology. The name of this species is the Latin adjective “elongata” meaning elongate, in reference to the elongate body shape of this species. Description. Alisalia elongata may be distinguished from the other two Alisalia species recorded from Canada by the approximately uniformly coloured body (Fig. 4), the larger size (length 2.0 mm; maximum width 0.2 mm); strongly transverse pronotum and elytra (Fig. 4), and the characteristic shape of the median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view with an elongate subapical part (Fig. 19). It has fewer transverse antennal articles than for A. testacea and A. minuta. See the key for the differences between this and the other Nearctic species. Figures Ι9 – 22. Alisalia elongata Klimaszewski & Webster, sp. n.: Ι9 median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view 20 male tergite 8 2Ι male sternite 8 22 paramere. Map 3. Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of Alisalia elongata Body length 2.0 mm, narrow but distinctly broader at elytra, and with abdomen slightly tapering posteriad; approximately uniformly dark reddish-brown, but head, elytra and posterior part of abdomen appearing slightly darker than the remainder of the body, legs and bases of antennae yellowish (Fig. 4); punctation on forebody fine and dense; microsculpture inconspicuous; pubescence of head directed obliquely lateroanterad, on pronotum laterad from midline of disc, on elytra obliquely or straight posteriad, and on abdomen approximately straight posteriad (Fig. 4); antennae moderately broad as illustrated (Fig. 4); pronotum distinctly narrower than elytra, 2 times as wide as long; elytra slightly transverse; abdomen with sharply delimited horizontal basal depressions. MALE: tergite 8 truncate apically (Fig. 20); sternite 8 broadly rounded apically (Fig. 21). Median lobe of aedeagus with elongate and sinuate tubus, subapical part long and approximately straight, and medio-basal part strongly convex, crista apicalis of bulbus broad (Fig. 19), flagellum slightly projecting externally, straight in shape (Fig. 19). Paramere as illustrated (Fig. 22). FE- MALE. Unknown. Bionomics Macrohabitat: river margin. Microhabitat: under small rocks in gravel. Collecting period: May. Collecting method: aspirating from under rocks and gravel. Distribution (Map 3). CANADA: New Brunswick .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".