MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968697134 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3791287

Neanastatinae Kalina 1984

2009· article· en· W6968697134 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScutellumDorsumSulcusApex (geometry)Simple eye in invertebratesWing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key to Genera of Neanastatinae 1 Acropleuron differentiated by uniformly developed crenulate sulcus curved to anterodorsal margin of pleuron near apex of prepectus (Figs 51, 60: acs); pronotum strongly transverse in dorsal view (Figs 49, 59: no 1) and almost vertical in lateral view (Figs 51, 60: no 1) [extinct]....................................... 2 − Acropleuron differentiated by linear sulcus extended anteriorly to level at least in line with apex of tegula where obliterate (Figs 22, 24: acs) or extended dorsally as less distinct, posteriorly curved furrow or line to anterodorsal margin of pleuron near middle of prepectus (Fig. 41: acs); pronotum elongatesubtriangular in dorsal view (Figs 1–4, 27, 39: no 1) and with extensive dorsal surface in lateral view (Figs 19, 21) [extinct or extant]................................ 3 2(1) Head with occipital carina (Fig. 59: oc); axillae distinguished from scutellum by linear scutoscutellar sutures (Fig. 59: sss) and with inner angles separated by distance equal to about half own width; scutellum not carinate laterally (Fig. 59); fore wing with bare band separated from parastigma by setal region about equal in width to bare band (Fig. 62: spc); mesoscutum undifferentiated, lacking parapsidal ridges (Fig. 59)................... Neanaperiallus gen. n. − Head without occipital carina; axillae distinguished from scutellum by crenulate scutoscutellar sutures (Fig. 49: sss) and with contiguous inner angles; scutellum with carina extending along side from apex of axilla (Fig. 49: scc); fore wing with bare band contiguous with parastigma (Fig. 50: spc); mesoscutum differentiated into median and lateral regions by longitudinal, posteriorly ridged parapsidal lines (Figs 49, 51: psr)............... Aspidopleura gen. n. 3(1) Scutellum divided mediolongitudinally (Figs 4, 17, 18); axillae with inner angles separated by at least twice own width (Figs 4, 17); head lenticular with vertex and temples carinately margined relative to occiput; fore wing with linea calva extending to base of wing along anal margin (Fig. 7: lc); flagellum with basal segment ring-like and with 5 distinct funicular segments................................................................................................. Neanastatus Girault − Scutellum undivided (Figs 1–3); axillae with inner angles contiguous (Figs 2, 3, 13, 15) or at most separated by distance about equal to own width (Figs 1, 11); head ovoid with vertex and temples smoothly rounded into occiput or only vertex carinately margined (Fig. 23); fore wing either entirely setose or with linea calva (Fig. 6: lc) extending only to basal cell; flagellum with or without differentiated ring segment, but with 7 or 8 distinct funicular segments.................................................................................... 4 4(3) Head and mesosoma patterned and at least partly yellowish to brown even if with some metallic luster (Fig. 1); scutellar-axillar complex with slightly divergent longitudinal grooves differentiating broadly separated quadrangular axillae on either side of anteriorly truncate scutellum (Figs 1, 11, 12); metanotum, propodeum and petiole all large and conspicuous regions posterior to scutellum (Figs 1, 11, 12); flagellum with 7 funicular segments............................................................................................... Eopelma Gibson − Head and mesosoma uniformly dark with variably distinct metallic luster (Figs 2, 3); scutellar-axillar complex with strongly divergent grooves differentiating triangular axillae on either side of anteriorly angulate scutellum (Figs 2, 3, 13, 15, 40); metanotum medially concealed or overlain by apex of scutellum and petiole an inconspicuous, almost linear transverse strip (Figs 14, 15: ptl); flagellum with 8 funicular segments........................................ 5 5(4) Acropleuron separated from metapleuron by convex, deeply divided upper and lower mesepimeron (Fig. 20: uep, lep); scutellum with carina extending along side from apex of axilla (Figs 2, 14: scc); metanotum with dorsellum V- like protuberant under scutellar apex (Figs 13: dor, 14)........... Metapelma Westwood − Acropleuron extending completely to metapleuron (Figs 21, 41); scutellum without carina along side (Figs 3, 15, 39); metanotum with dorsellum transverse under apex of scutellum (Figs 15, 16, 40)........................................... 6 6(5) Mesoscutum with longitudinal parapsidal ridges differentiating elongate-rectangular median mesoscutal region from lateral regions (Fig. 39: psr); mesosternum without transepisternal sulcus (Fig. 41); hypopygium of female extending about half length of gaster (Fig. 35: hyp) [extinct]............ Brevivulva gen. n. − Mesoscutum not differentiated by ridged parapsidal lines (Figs 3, 21); mesosternum with transepisternal sulcus (cf. Figs 24, 26: tss); hypopygium of female extending almost to apex of gaster [extant].............. Lambdobregma Gibson

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSynthetic Organic Chemistry MethodsFrench-language works237,207