Nutritional Properties and Biochemical Effects of Pachira Insignia Cakes Treated by Grilling and Cooking in Young Wistar Rats
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Pachira insignis seed cakes, treated raw, roasted, or boiled, in young male Wistar rats. The cakes were characterized physicochemically , showing protein contents of 8.37 to 11.03% and variations in total sugars, phenolic compounds, and tannins depending on the treatment. Twenty-five rats were divided into five groups, including a negative control, a casein-positive control, and three groups fed the respective cakes as a protein source. The 13-day experiment revealed an initial weight gain in the rats fed the roasted and boiled cakes, followed by a decline, while the raw cake group did not survive. Biochemical analyses showed signs of toxicity, including elevated levels of urea, creatinine, and transaminases (ALAT and ASAT) in the treated groups compared to the casein group. The organ masses (heart, liver, kidney, testes) of rats in the grilled and boiled groups were greater than those in the casein group. These results indicate that Pachira cakes insignis, regardless of the preparation, exhibit toxicity in young rats, which limits their use as a protein source.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it