Hyetussa longithorax Bustamante & Ruiz 2017, comb. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hyetussa longithorax (Petrunkevitch, 1925) comb. nov. Fig. 14 Mica longithorax Petrunkevitch, 1925: 246 (female holotype from “Trijoles” [Frijoles], Canal Zone [9.13°N, 79.73°W], Panama, J.M. Valentine, deposited in YPM, considered lost (see comments below), not examined). Micalula longithorax: Strand, 1932: 141 (comb. nov. by generic replacement name); World Spider Catalog 2017. Type material. In a recent attempt to examine the type specimen of this species, we learned that the YPM does not have the types of Mica longithorax (R. Pupedis, L. Munstermann, pers. comm.). Thus, this type is considered lost (article 75.3.4 of ICZN). Although Petrunkevitch's (1925) description enables the identification of this species, its importance as the type species of a monotypic genus requires the designation of a neotype (ICZN article 75.3.1): a female neotype from Starfish Beach, Isla Colón (09.40441°N, 82.32610°W), 0 m elev., Bocas del Toro, Panama, 26.IX.2008, J.X. Zhang & G.B. Edwards leg., deposited in the Spencer Entomological Collection, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada (UBC-SEM), a recognized scientific institution that maintains a research collection with proper facilities for preserving name-bearing types (ICZN article 75.3.7). The neotype was chosen based on the proximity to the type locality and comparisons of this specimen with the original description (see Petrunkevitch 1925: fig. 155; compare with our Fig. 14D; ICZN articles 75.3.2 and 75.3.5). Diagnosis. Females differ from all known species of this genus in having a reduced spination (v2 di) on leg I. Description. Male. Unknown. Female (neotype). Total length: 2.80. Carapace 1.23 long, 0.77 wide, 0.46 high. Ocular quadrangle 0.65 long. Anterior eye row 0.65 wide and posterior 0.69 wide. Chelicera paturon with one promarginal and one retromarginal tooth, the promarginal with three cusps, the middle one largest, and the retromarginal with one curved cusp. Length of femur: I 0.55, II 0.44, III 0.49, IV 0.70; patella + tibia: I 0.64, II 0.55, III 0.56, IV 0.83; metatarsus + tarsus: I 0.53, II 0.49, III 0.60, IV 0.73. Leg formula: 4132. Leg spination: femur I‒IV 0; patella I‒IV 0; tibia I‒IV 0; metatarsus I v2 di; II‒IV 0. Epigyne (Figs 14D‒14E): posterior edge bilobed, copulatory openings anteriorly placed. Color in alcohol: carapace brown with a tuft of white scales behind PLE, dark striation on the thoracic region and posterior borders with tufts of white scales, abdomen dorsum with three tufts of white scales anteriorly placed, middle of the abdomen with a pair of tufts of white scales on the sides, end of abdomen with a pair of tufts of white scales near to anal tubercle, venter of the abdomen brown, spinnerets brown. Distribution. Only known from Panama.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".