Bibliographic record
Abstract
Brochymena quadripustulata (Fabricius, 1775) Distribution: Canada: AB, BC, NB (Larivière 1992, Roch 2020), MB (Maw et al. 2000), NS (Larivière 1992, Roch 2020), ON, QC, SK (Larivière 1992). United States: AK (Scudder & Sikes 2014), AL (Larivière 1992), AR, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, DE (Larivière 1992), FL, GA (Herrich-Schäfer 1839, Scott & Fiske 1902, Larivière 1992), IA, ID (Harris & Shull 1944, Furniss 1972, Larivière 1992), IL, IN, KS, KY (Larivière 1992), LA, MA, MD, ME (Larivière 1992, Roch 2020), MI, MN (Lugger 1900, Larivière 1992, Rider 2012, Koch et al. 2014), MO, MS, MT (Larivière 1992), NC, ND (Larivière 1992, Rider 2012), NE, NH, NJ, NM, NV (Larivière 1992), NY, OH, OK, OR (Torre-Bueno 1934, Larivière 1992, Hedstrom et al. 2017), PA, SC, SD (Parshley 1922, Harris 1937, Larivière 1992), TN (Howden & Crossley 1961, Larivière 1992), TX (Uhler 1876, Snow 1906, Tucker 1917, Torre-Bueno 1931, Larivière 1992), UT, VA, VT (Larivière 1992, Roch 2020), WA (Wallis & Turner 1972, Larivière 1992, Zack et al. 2012), WI (Stål 1872, Larivière 1992), WV (Brown et al. 1988, Larivière 1992). (Hawaii) Comments: Lugger (1900) recorded Brochymena annulata from Minnesota; this is clearly a misdetermination and should be referred to this species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".