Semanotus ligneus Fabricius 1787
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Semanotus ligneus (Fabricius, 1787) (Figs 4 B,D, 5F, 12A, 16C; Map 5) Callidium ligneum Fabricius, 1787: 153 Callidium russicum Stephens, 1831: 248, plate XXII fig. 2 Callidium nicolas White, 1855: 321 Anocomis lignea parvicollis Casey, 1912: 272 Material examined. 401 males, 380 females, 121 sex undetermined. Holotype. Male (ZMUC), examined; labelled “// ZMUC 00022367”. Diagnosis. This species can be separated from other species of Semanotus by the following combination of characters: color dark brown to black; elytra pale yellow except for black maculation in the form of one pair of medium sized spots and apical 1/3 of elytra, rarely with spots enlarged basally to form an oblong ‘tongue-like’ longitudinal band; mandible without median tooth; elytral punctation and pubescence distinct: pale setae restricted to pale areas where the punctation is larger and more widely separated, and dark setae restricted to dark areas where the punctation is smaller, and almost contiguous (in the rare case when the basal area of the elytra is dark, the pubescence remains pale), pubescence semi-erect to decumbent; elytra with erect setae along suture usually only in basal ½; ventral pubescence white to grey, semi-erect to decumbent, fine, sparse, surface of ventrites not obscured. Hosts. Thuja occidentalis L. (eastern white cedar), Cupressus sp., Juniperus sp. Flower and Associated Vegetation Records. Pinus sp., Juniperus sp. Distribution. Eastern Canada and USA, south to Oklahoma and eastern Texas. Remarks. The current definition of S. ligneus as treated here is much more limited than the species concept of previous authors, as a number of subspecies have been removed from synonymy and have been given species status. The holotype of Anocomis lignea parvicollis is a smaller specimen of S. ligneus; it has yellow setae in the pale areas of the elytra and the elytra pale yellow which is typical of S. ligneus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".