MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968810764 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6168572

Priopoda impressa Reshchikov, 2012, sp. n.

2012· article· en· W6968810764 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMandible (arthropod mouthpart)OvipositorHolotypeApex (geometry)ImpressionGenus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Priopoda impressa sp. n. Figs 1–8 Diagnosis. This species differs from other members of the genus by combination of all the following characters: 1) longitudinal impression of mesopleuron (Fig. 3)—unique for this species; 2) apically compressed metasoma; 3) very shallow notch of apical margin of subgenital plate; 4) fine punctures of face and mesopleuron (Figs 2, 3); 5) complete propodeal carinae (Fig. 1); 6) ovipositor with shallow impression at its middle (Fig. 4); 7) apical part of clypeus yellow (Fig. 2). Description. Holotype female. Fore wing 5 mm long, body about 5.5 mm. Antenna with 36-38 flagellomeres. Scapus 0.58 × as long as wide. Head not narrowed behind eyes. Maximal length of temple equal to transverse eye diameter; minimal length of temple 0.67 × transverse eye diameter. Face width 0.79 × height of eye; convex, medially bulging, with oblique grooves on sides from antennal foveae (Fig. 2). Clypeus separated from face by groove; apical margin of clypeus moderately obtuse. Clypeal foveae large and deep. Malar space as wide as 0.4 of basal mandible width. Lower mandible tooth longer and wider than upper. Head shiny; face and clypeus punctate. Mesosoma shiny. Propleuron with the small lobe. Pronotum on sides distinctly punctate, shiny. Notaulus absent. Mesopleuron smooth, with longitudinal deep impression at the middle (Opheltes species have similar furrow extending across the middle of the mesopleuron) and impression in lower fore part (resembling sternaulus of Cryptinae) (Fig. 3). Lower part of mesopleuron punctate (Fig. 3). Epicnemial carina strongly raised. Postpectal carina present at the middle (see between coxae). Fore wing with areolet not petiolate (Fig. 6). Radius intercepting stigma at its middle (Fig. 6). Second recurrent vein with single bulla. Nervellus intercepted above middle. Nervulus slightly postfurcal. Femur length 4.73 × width; ratio of segments 1-5 of hind tarsus: 5: 2.1: 1.6: 1: 1.3. Claws pectinate with small teeth (Fig. 8). Propodeum with strongly raised complete carinae (Fig. 1). Metasoma shiny, smooth, not punctate, slightly compressed apically. First metasomal tergite convex dorsally; its width 0.34 × length; with shallow median longitudinal impression in apical part; bordered by lateral longitudinal carinae only in apically; medial longitudinal carinae absent (Fig. 5). Glymma rather deep so that septum is semitransparent. Second metasomal tergite without longitudinal carina at base, elongate. Ovipositor straight, as long as height of metasoma, stout at base, without notch at apex (Fig. 4). Male. Subgenital plate with very shallow notch. Parameres narrow, elongate (Fig. 7). Aedeagus not broad. Tip of aedeagus slightly curved, rounded, without flat area. Coloration. Body mostly black (Figs 1–8). Scapus reddish-yellow, pedicellus brownish, antennal flagella dark brown. Apical part of clypeus (Fig. 2), fore and middle legs except coxae, hind femur, ventral part of hind tibia, metasomal terga except first and second tergites (Fig. 6) reddish-yellow. Basal part of mandibles, tegulae, coxae whitish. First metasomal tergite black. Stigma dark. Apical part of hind femur, dorsal part of hind tibia and tarsus, second metasomal tergite brown. Type material: Holotype female, Nepal, Kathmandu, Godavari, 6000 ft, 17–20.vii.1967, Malaise Trap, Canadian Expedition, CNC; Paratype specimens: 4 females and 3 males, Nepal, Kathmandu, Godavari, 6000 ft., 17–20.vii.1967, Malaise Trap, CNC; 1 female, Nepal, Kathmandu, Godavari, 6000 ft, 17- 20.vii.1967, Malaise Trap, CNC; 2 females, Nepal, Kathmandu, Godavari, 5000 ft, 27–30.vii.1967, Malaise Trap, CNC; 1 female, Nepal, Kathmandu, Godavari, 6000 ft, 17–20.vii.1967, Malaise Trap, CNC; 3 females and 6 males, Nepal, Kathmandu, Pulchauki, 6600 ft, 1–14.viii.1967, Malaise Trap, Canadian Expedition, CNC; 1 female and 1 male, Nepal, Kathmandu, Pulchauki, 6600 ft, 1–14.viii.1967, Malaise Trap, Canadian Expedition, ZIN; 5 females, Nepal, Kathmandu, Pulchauki, 7300 ft, 1–27.viii.1967, Malaise Trap, CNC. Distribution: Nepal Etymology: The species epithet impressa refers to the structure of the mesopleuron.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy→French-language works237,207→