Platylabus hyperetis Heinrich 1962
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Platylabus hyperetis Heinrich, 1962 (Figure 25) Platylabus hyperetis Heinrich, 1962b: 707 (descr., key, allotype designation); Heinrich 1977: 275 (descr., distr., key); Bradley 1978: 7 (distr., host); Carlson 1979: 544 (cat., distr.); Butler 1993: 506 (host); Schmidt and Schmidt 2011: 79 (cat.); Yu and Horstmann 1997: 679 (cat.); Yu et al. 2016 (cat.). Original type series Holotype ♀, by original designation (ZSM); Allotype 1♂ (ZSM); paratypes: 3♀♀ and 1♂ (ZSM), 1♂ (CNCI). Type locality United States of America, Maine, ‘New Portland’. Updated distribution (Figure 25) CANADA: British Columbia (Heinrich 1962b; Bradley 1978), Saskatchewan (Bradley 1978); UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: Arkansas (Heinrich 1977), Maine (Heinrich 1962b), West Virginia (Butler 1993). Host Plagodis alcoolaria Guenée (Bradley 1978), Plagodis serinaria Herrich-Schaffer (Butler 1993), Probole amicaria Herrich-Schaffer (Heinrich 1962b; Heinrich 1977) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Male Described by Heinrich (1962b, p. 707) from three males, one of which was designated as allotype. Comments Carlson (1979, p. 544) did not take Bradley’s (1978) paper into consideration and listed only Probole amicaria Herrich-Schaffer as the species host. Butler (1993, p. 506), in listing the parasitoids from Macrolepidoptera, indirectly recorded the species for the first time from West Virginia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".