Watching Brief at Langford Mill Eel Screen
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Archaeological monitoring was undertaken during the removal of vegetation and topsoil for the crane platform, turning area and access areas within the site. The excavation was undertaken using a mini digger fitted with a flat blade ditching bucket in thin 100mm layers. The archaeological monitoring was carried out in accordance with CIfA's Standard and Guidance for an Archaeological Watching Brief . The archaeological watching brief recorded no significant archaeological features, deposits or finds. However, a concrete foundation/plinth thought to correspond to a former mill building, constructed in 1879 and demolished in the mid-20th-century, was exposed. It is uncertain whether this feature may represent the original foundation of the mill building wall or a modern capping of the foundation below. The plinth/foundation was sealed by a modern consolidation deposit which extended across the majority of the stripped area. Gravels, which may represent re-deposited natural river terrace gravels, or potentially the interface between the topsoil and the natural geology were recorded at 0.48m below ground level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it