Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atheta (Dimetrota auct.) hampshirensis Bernhauer, 1909 (Figs. 13–14 in Lohse & Smetana 1985; Figs. 71–74 in Klimaszewski & Winchester 2002) Homalota moesta Mäklin in Mannerheim, 1852: 307 (nec Zetterstedt, 1828: 101). Atheta (Dimetrota) moesta: Bernhauer, 1907: 394 (as valid species). Atheta (Dimetrota) hampshirensis Bernhauer, 1909: 525. Atheta (Philhygra) leviceps Casey, 1910a: 66, syn. nov. Dimetrota (s. str.) sectator Casey, 1910a: 102, syn. nov. Dimetrota (s. str.) retrusa Casey, 1910a: 103, syn. nov. Datomicra (s. str.) hebescens Casey, 1910a: 124, syn. nov. Datomicra (s. str.) insolida Casey, 1910a: 125, syn. nov. Datomicra (s. str.) pellax Casey, 1910a: 124, syn. nov. Pseudota vana Casey, 1911a: 150, syn. nov. Dimetrota sectator: Casey, 1911b: 252 (as valid species). Dimetrota insolida: Casey, 1911b: 252 (as synonym of Dimetrota sectator). Atheta (Dimetrota) maeklini Fenyes, 1920: 205 (replacement name for Atheta moesta (Mäklin in Mannerheim, 1852) (nec Zetterstedt, 1828). Atheta (Dimetrota) moesta: Fenyes, 1920: 205 (as synonym of At. maeklini). Atheta (Pancota) vana: Fenyes, 1920: 203 (as valid species). Atheta (Dimetrota) hampshirensis: Fenyes, 1920: 205 (as valid species). Atheta (Dimetrota) sectator: Fenyes, 1920: 205 (as valid species). Atheta (Dimetrota) insolida: Fenyes, 1920: 205 (as synonym of At. sectator). Atheta (Dimetrota) retrusa: Fenyes, 1920: 205 (as valid species). Atheta (Datomicra) hebescens: Fenyes, 1920: 220 (as valid species). Atheta (Datomicra) pellax: Fenyes, 1920: 220 (as valid species). Atheta (Pancota) vana: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 661 (as valid species). Atheta (Dimetrota) hampshirensis: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 663 (as valid species). Atheta (Dimetrota) maeklini: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 664 (as valid species). Atheta (Dimetrota) moesta: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 664 (as synonym of At. maeklini). Atheta (Dimetrota) sectator: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 665 (as valid species). Atheta (Dimetrota) insolida: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 665 (as synonym of At. sectator). Atheta (Dimetrota) retrusa: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 665 (as valid species). Atheta (Datomicra) hebescens: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 668 (as valid species). Atheta (Datomicra) pellax: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 668 (as valid species). Atheta (Dimetrota) hampshirensis: Moore & Legner, 1975: 362 (as valid species). Atheta (Dimetrota) maeklini: Moore & Legner, 1975: 365 (as valid species). Atheta (Dimetrota) moesta: Moore & Legner, 1975: 365 (as synonym of At. maeklini). Atheta (Dimetrota) sectator: Moore & Legner, 1975: 373 (as valid species). Atheta (Dimetrota) insolida: Moore & Legner, 1975: 373 (as synonym of At. sectator). Atheta (Dimetrota) retrusa: Moore & Legner, 1975: 372 (as valid species). Atheta (Datomicra) hebescens: Moore & Legner, 1975: 362 (as valid species; misspelled as herbescens). Atheta (Datomicra) pellax: Moore & Legner, 1975: 369 (as valid species). Atheta (Pancota) vana: Moore & Legner, 1975: 376 (as valid species). Dimetrota hampshirensis: Seevers, 1978: 259 (as valid species). Dimetrota maeklini: Seevers, 1978: 259 (as valid species). Dimetrota moesta: Seevers, 1978: 259 (as synonym of Dim. maeklini). Dimetrota sectator: Seevers, 1978: 260 (as valid species). Dimetrota insolida: Seevers, 1978: 260 (as synonym of Dim. sectator). Dimetrota retrusa: Seevers, 1978: 260 (as valid species). Datomicra hebescens: Seevers, 1978: 259 (as valid species). Datomicra pellax: Seevers, 1978: 259 (as valid species). Pseudota vana: Seevers, 1978: 261 (as valid species). Dimetrota moesta: Lohse & Smetana, 1985: 289 (as valid species). Atheta (Dimetrota) moesta: Klimaszewski & Winchester, 2002: 29 (as synonym of At. hampshirensis). Atheta (Dimetrota) hampshirensis: Klimaszewski & Winchester, 2002: 29 (as valid species). Atheta (Dimetrota) maeklini: Klimaszewski & Winchester, 2002: 29 (as synonym of At. hampshirensis). Type material. Lectotype of Homalota moesta (designated by Lohse and Smetana (1985)): UNITED STATES: Alaska: ♂, Sitka (MZHF). Lectotype of Atheta hampshirensis (here designated): ♂, “N.[ew] H.[ampshire], Fall”, “7603”, “ hampshirensis Bernh. Typus. Fenyes!” (yellow label), “Chicago NHMus M.Bernhauer Collection ” (FMNH). Lectotype of Atheta leviceps (here designated): ♀, “N.[ew] Y.[ork] [Catskill Mts.]”, “ leviceps Csy. ”, “TYPE USNM 39362” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Paralectotypes: 2♂♂, ♀, “N.Y.[Catskill Mts.]”, “ leviceps PARATYPE USNM 39362” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Lectotype of Dimetrota sectator (here designated): ♂, “Cal.[ifornia] [Gilroy Hot Springs, Santa Clara Co.]”, “ sectator Csy. ”, “TYPE USNM 39118” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Paralectotypes: 2♂♂, 2♀♀, specimens, “Cal.[ifornia] [Gilroy Hot Springs, Santa Clara Co.]”, “ sectator PARATYPE USNM 39118” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Lectotype of Dimetrota retrusa (here designated): ♂, “Metlakatla, B.[ritish] Col.[umbia]”, “ retrusa Csy. ”, “TYPE USNM 39120” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Paralectotypes: ♂, 5♀♀, “Metlakatla, B.[ritish] Col.[umbia]”, “ retrusa PARATYPE USNM 39120” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Lectotype of Datomicra hebescens (here designated): ♂, “N.[ew]Y.[ork][Catskill Mts.]”, “ hebescens Csy. ”, “TYPE USNM 39176” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Paralectotypes: 8 specimens, “N.[ew]Y.[ork][Catskill Mts.]”, “ hebescens PARATYPE USNM 39176” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Lectotype of Datomicra insolida (here designated): ♂, “Cal.[ifornia] [Gilroy Hot Springs, Santa Clara Co.]”, “ insolida Csy. ”, “TYPE USNM 39119” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Paralectotypes: 2 specimens, “Cal.[ifornia] [Gilroy Hot Springs, Santa Clara Co.]”, 7 specimens (1 without head and prothorax), “Cal.[ifornia] [San Francisco]”, “ insolida PARATYPE USNM 39119” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Holotype of Datomicra pellax: ♀, “R.[hode] I.[sland][Boston Neck]”, “ pellax Csy. ”, “TYPE USNM 39171” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Lectotype of Pseudota vana (here designated): ♂, “Q.[ueen] C.[harlotte] I.[slands][Massett (Keen)]”, “ vana Csy. ”, “TYPE USNM 39157” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Paralectotype: ♀, “Q.[ueen] C.[harlotte] I.[slands][Massett (Keen)]”, “ vana PARATYPE USNM 39157” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). Additional material: UNITED STATES: Alaska: ♀, Kenai (Holmberg) (MZHF); New York: Orange Co.: 4 specimens, 8 km S New Windsor, Black Rock Forest, 23– 25.v.1998 (V.I.Gusarov) (SPSU); North Carolina: Haywood Co.: 13 specimens, Cold Springs Creek, Forest Road 148, 29 km N Waynesville, Pisgah National Forest, 35º44.6'N 83º00.3'W, 750 m, 4.vi.2001 (V.I.Gusarov) (SPSU); Pennsylvania: ♀, 41º08.39'N 75º32.24'W, in mushrooms, 16.viii.1998 (V.I.Gusarov) (SPSU); CANADA: Québec: ♂, St.JacquesdeLeeds, 46º16'N 71º23'W, maple forest, 8.vii.1994 (SPSU). Diagnosis. See Lohse & Smetana (1985). Discussion. The types of Homalota moesta, At. hampshirensis, At. leviceps, Dim. sectator, Dim. retrusa, Dat. hebescens, Dat. insolida, Dat. pellax and Pseudota vana are similar in external characters and the shape of the aedeagus and spermatheca. Distribution. Atheta hampshirensis is widespread in the United States (Alaska, Washington (Lohse & Smetana 1985), Oregon, California, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania and North Carolina) and Canada (British Columbia and Québec).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.043 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".