Agromyza pseudoreptans Nowakowski
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agromyza pseudoreptans Nowakowski (Fig. 73) Material examined. VERMONT: Chittenden Co., Essex, Woodside Park, 27.vi.2013, em. 16.x.2013, C.S. Eiseman, ex Urtica dioica ssp. gracilis, #CSE944, CNC392661 (1♂). Host. Urticaceae: Urtica dioica L. Leaf mine. (Fig. 73) A brownish or dark greenish linear-blotch; according to Spencer & Steyskal (1986), normally commencing along the leaf margin, turning black when old. Spencer (1969, 1981) had only described the mine as turning darker brown, in contrast with the more blackish mine of Agromyza reptans Fallén, and this is consistent with our observations. Most mines at the Vermont collection site did begin at the leaf margin and follow it for several serrations before becoming a blotch and expanding away from it; however, the mine from which we reared an adult began at a lateral vein away from the leaf margin, then gradually meandered toward the margin, initially bounded by two major veins. The mines are messy-looking, with frass in irregular, dark lumps. Puparium. Reddish-brown; formed outside the mine. Distribution. USA: AK, CA, ID, MN (Scheffer et al. 2007), OR, WA, *VT; Canada: AB, BC, MB, NT, ON, QC; Europe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".