Agromyza pseudoreptans Nowakowski
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agromyza pseudoreptans Nowakowski (Fig. 73) Material examined. VERMONT: Chittenden Co., Essex, Woodside Park, 27.vi.2013, em. 16.x.2013, C.S. Eiseman, ex Urtica dioica ssp. gracilis, #CSE944, CNC392661 (1♂). Host. Urticaceae: Urtica dioica L. Leaf mine. (Fig. 73) A brownish or dark greenish linear-blotch; according to Spencer & Steyskal (1986), normally commencing along the leaf margin, turning black when old. Spencer (1969, 1981) had only described the mine as turning darker brown, in contrast with the more blackish mine of Agromyza reptans Fallén, and this is consistent with our observations. Most mines at the Vermont collection site did begin at the leaf margin and follow it for several serrations before becoming a blotch and expanding away from it; however, the mine from which we reared an adult began at a lateral vein away from the leaf margin, then gradually meandered toward the margin, initially bounded by two major veins. The mines are messy-looking, with frass in irregular, dark lumps. Puparium. Reddish-brown; formed outside the mine. Distribution. USA: AK, CA, ID, MN (Scheffer et al. 2007), OR, WA, *VT; Canada: AB, BC, MB, NT, ON, QC; Europe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".