Bibliographic record
Abstract
Micropsectra polita (Malloch) Figs 49A–G Diagnosis. Labrum and premandible as in Fig. 49A; pecten epipharyngis with three toothed plates; labral lamella with tight row of 28 teeth; premandible with two apical teeth; antenna (Fig. 49B) almost as long as head, pedestal (Fig. 49C) with small apical spur, stalk of LO twice as long as segment 2, AR 2.14; mandible (Fig. 49D) with slightly angled outer margin, but without lobe; mentum (Fig. 49E) with toothed margin evenly arched; VM plate with narrow medial gap; posterior end of abdomen as in Fig. 49F; anal tubules curled ventrally; posterior parapod with about 60 claws arranged in horseshoe pattern. Notes. Generally fits larval description given by Oliver and Dillon (1994), although the AR was outside the lower end of range (2.20–2.49). Cases (Fig. 49G) are made of loose fine detritus, probably attached to rocks. Ecology and habitat. Larvae have a preference for low order streams with maximum range temperature of 10–18 °C and slow seepage areas (Oliver & Dillon 1994). Larvae occurred in all study streams in large numbers. They were the dominant species of Chironomidae in study streams. Sampling sites. We found the larvae inhabiting streams in all the provincial parks and districts located in our study area. Nearctic distribution. Canada: Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario, and Québec. USA: Pennsylvania, Maryland, South Dakota, Illinois south to Arizona.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".