MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968923202 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7521952

Malus hupehensis Rehder

2022· article· en· W6968923202 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomics of Agriculture and Food Markets
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalusBeijingPyrus communisChina

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2. Malus hupehensis (Pamp.) Rehder Figs 11–12 Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 14 (3): 207 (Rehder 1933). Pirus communis Pavol., Nuovo Giornale botanico italiano 15: 415 (Pavolini 1908, non Linnaeus 1753). – Pirus hupehensis Pamp., Nuovo Giornale botanico italiano 17: 291 (Pampanini 1910). – Malus domestica var. hupehensis (Pamp.) Likhonos, Trudy po prikladnoi botanike genetike i selektsii 52 (3): 30 (Likhonos 1974). – Sinomalus hupehensis (Pamp.) Rushforth, Phytologia 100 (4): 245 (Rushforth 2018). – Type: CHINA • Hubei, Sian-men-kou; alt. ca 900 m; 1 May and 10 Jul. 1906; fl, fr; C. Silvestri 939; syntype: A [A00026649], photo! Malus theifera Rehder, Plantae Wilsonianae Vol. 2 (2): 283 (Rehder 1915). – Pyrus theifera (Rehder) L.H.Bailey, Rhodora 18: 155 (Bailey 1916a). – Type: CHINA • Hubei, Ichang; alt. 1000–1600 m; 27 May and Nov. 1907; fl, fr; E.H. Wilson 451; lectotype: A [A00026656]!, here designated; isolectotype: A [A00026658]!, GH [GH00026657, GH00026659]!, K [K000758418, K000758419]!. Examined specimens CHINA – Anhui • Jinzhai; 18 May 2005; fr; M. Liu et al. A100139; PE • Huoshan; 20 Jun. 2005; fr; M. Liu et al. A50170; PE • Yuexi; 14 Aug. 1997; fr; Z.W. Xie & L. Zheng 97031; PE. – Beijing • Beijing botanical garden; Aug. 2003; st; L.C. Zhao s.n.; BJFC • 28 Aug. 1962; fl, fr; Renguo 22; PE. – Chongqing • Shizhu; 20 Sep. 1983; fl, fr; N.G. Jiang & L.C. Wang 139; PE • Wushan; 11 May 2008; fl; Zhiwusuo Sanxia Expedition 1460; PE. – Fujian • Chongan; 15 Sep. 1980; fr; Wuyi Expedition 2102; NAS • Taining; 5 Oct. 2017; fr; X.L. Hou 90987; AU • locality unknown; 25 Mar. 2016; fl; X.X. Su CSH15120; AU. – Gansu • Gannan; 5 Sep. 1958; st; Z.Y. Zhang 467; IBK • ibid.; 13 Aug. 1963; fr; Z.Y. Zhang 16584; PE • ibid.; 8 May 1957; fl; P. Zhang & L.F. Qi 914; PE. – Guangdong • Liannan; 9 Aug. 1958; fr; P.X. Tan 58919; KUN, PE, NAS, IBK, IBSC, SZ. – Guangxi • Xingan; 11 Sep. 1957; fr; Y.B. Xu 10689; IBK • Linchuan; 4 May 2015; fr; Zhang et al. 2015-148; PE • Min Shan; 13 Jun. 1928; fr; R.C. Ching 5935; IBSC, PE. – Guizhou • Songtao; 7 Jul. 1959; fr; Qianbei Team 1357; IBK, NAS, PE • Guiyang; 24 Mar. 1959: fl; Qiannan Team 0086; PE. – Henan • Lingbao; 11 May 2015; fl; Zhu et al. 150511032; AU • Xixia; 16 Jul. 1960; fr; K.J. Guan & T.L. Dai 1132; PE. – Hong Kong • locality unkonwn; 20 Aug. 1929; fr; C. Wang 3209; NAS. – Hubei • Badong; 22 Nov. 1997; fr; C.M. Tan 971816; IBSC, JJF • Xinshan; 8 Aug. 2008; fr; Zhao et al. EX1632; PE • Shennongjia; 29 Apr. 1987; fl; L.Q. Chen IV050001; CCAU. – Hunan • Hengshan; 1 Jun. 1943; fr; S.Q. Chen 3456; KUN, IBSC • Xinshao; 26 Apr. 2005; fl; B.Y. Li 6072; PE, HITBC, HUST. – Jilin • Fusong; 18 Sep. 1956; fr; C.S. Wang 629; IBK. – Jiangsu • Longche; 17 Aug. 1929; fr; Y.K. Keng 2421; IBSC • Nanjing; 9 Apr. 2012; fl; Y.N. Xiong & Z.X. Ma 4416; NAS. – Jiangxi • Wuning; 10 Aug. 1996; fr; C.M. Tan 9608050; IBSC • Lushan; 11 May 1953; fl; M.J. Wang 01518; LBG. – Shandong • Qingdao; 7 Jun. 1959; fr; T.Y. Zhou 1150; NAS • Kunyushan; 29 May 1957; fl; C.J. Liu & Q.S. Yan 151; PE. – Shaanxi • Langaoxian; 2 Aug. 2006; fr; Chen et al. 4727; WUK • T’aipeishan; 17 Apr. 1937; fl; T.P. Wang 6516; PE, IBK. – Shanghai • Chenshan; 16 Jun. 2011; fr; Li et al. SDP02735; CSH. – Sichuan • Liangshan; 16 Apr. 1983; fl; Fu et al. s.n.; PE • Emeishan; 21 Jul. 1952; fr; Xiong et al. 32123; IBK. – Yunnan • Kunming; 17 Aug. 1955; fr; J.S. Xin 50929; IBSC • Jianchuan; Jun. 1923; fl; G. Forrest 23523; PE. – Zhejiang • Andong; 27 Jun. 1987; fr; S.H. Xu L8532-138; IBSC • locality unknown; 5 May 1924; fl; R.C. Qin 1395; IBSC • Tianmushan; 14 May 1935; fl; H. Migo s.n.; PE. UNITED STATES – Massachusetts • Arnold Arboretum, cultivated; 27 Oct. 1973; fr; Shiu Ying Hu 13328; PE • ibid.; 12 May 1981; fl; S. Davis, C. Warren & M. Wolcott 81-286; PE. – New York • Ontario, cultivated; 25 Sep. 1990; st; Prof. Zhen-long Yan 1114; PE. Description Small tree or shrub, up to 8 m high. Branches terete, densely pubescent when young, glabrescent. Leaves petiolate, petiole ca 2 cm long, glabrescent. Lamina ca 6.6 × 3.6 cm, oval to ovate, usually aubergine in young leaves, base cuneate, rarely rounded, usually oblique, apex acuminate, rarely retuse, margin crenate to serrulate, blade abaxially puberulous or glabrescent, discolorous. Inflorescence umbellate, with 3‒6 flowers. Pedicel ca 2.1 cm long, glabrous or puberulent. Hypanthium usually glabrous. Sepals lanceolate to ovate triangular, abaxially glabrous, adaxially puberulous, caducous, rarely persistent. Petals ca 1.2 × 0.7 cm, white to red, obovate. Stamens 15‒20, unequal. Styles 3, rarely 4, longer than stamens, basally puberulent. Pome ca 0.8‒0.9 cm in diameter, subglobose, yellow to red. Carpopodium ca 2.9 cm long, glabrous or puberulent at base. Phenology Flowers from April to May. Mature fruits from August to September. Habitat Terrestrial, seasonally green, growing in forest on slopes or in valleys; 50‒2600 m a.s.l. Note The syntypes of Pyrus hupehensis Pamp. were collected in Sian-men-kou (Silvestri 939) and Ma-pauscian (Silvestri 940, 940a), Hubei (Hupeh), China. However, there are photographs from as early as 1932 in the Biondi herbarium at the Botanical Museum in Florence according to the record of Rehder, and now a scan of Silvestri 939 is available online in herbarium of Arnold Arboretum. Langenfeld designated a lectotype in 1991: 160 (CHINA • Fujian, Chongan, Sanghan-Tinmu-Guan; 11 Aug. 1952; Zhou Zhenying 239; lectotype: LE), but it is invalid because the type specimens have not been lost. Distribution China (Anhui, Chongqing, Fujian, Gansu, Guangxi, Guizhou, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Jilin, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Shandong, Shanxi, Shaanxi, HongKong, Yunnan, Zhejiang) (Fig. 11). Chromosome numbers 2n = 34, 51, 68.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicEconomics of Agriculture and Food MarketsFrench-language works237,207