Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alloxysta obscurata (Hartig, 1840) Figs 2.31, 5.3 Xystus obscuratus Hartig, 1840: 200. Type: deposited in ZSM (examined). Allotria obscuratus – Taschenberg 1866: 130. Allotria obscurata – Dalla Torre 1893: 34. Dilyta obscurata – Kieffer 1900: 114. Alloxysta (Alloxysta) obscurata – Dalla Torre & Kieffer 1902: 39. Alloxysta obscurata – Andrews 1978: 87. Diagnosis Alloxysta obscurata is mainly characterized by a partially open radial cell that is 2.7 times as long as wide (Fig. 5.3); the presence of pronotal carinae; the absence of propodeal carinae; female antenna with rhinaria beginning on F3, F1 longer than pedicel and F2, F2 subequal to F3, and F3 shorter than F4 (Fig. 2.31); male antenna with rhinaria beginning on F4, F2 slightly curved, F1 longer than pedicel and F2, F2 longer than F3, and F3 longer than F4. It is similar to A. macrophadna, but can be differentiated by the proportions of the flagellomere (F1 is longer than F2, F2 is shorter than F3, and F3 is shorter than F 4 in A. obscurata (Fig. 2.31), while F1 is subequal to F2, F2 is longer than F3, and F3 is subequal to F 4 in A. macrophadna (Fig. 2.25)), the shape of the flagellomere (no flagellomeres are curved in males of A. obscurata, but F2 and F3 are strongly curved in males of A. macrophadna), and the size of the radial cell (2.7 times as long as wide in A. obscurata (Fig. 5.3), but 3.0 times in A. macrophadna (Fig. 4.21)). Material examined Lectotype GERMANY: ♀, [second from top, lectotype H.H. Evenhuis (orange label)], [Xystus obscuratus Hartig det. H.H. Evenhuis 1980], [Alloxysta obscurata (Hartig, 1840) ♀ M. Ferrer-Suay det. 2011] (ZSM). Paralectotype GERMANY: ♀, [Xystus obscuratus Hartig det. H.H. Evenhuis 1980], [first from top, Paralectotype Xystus obscuratus Hartig, 1840 ♀], [Alloxysta obscurata (Hartig, 1840) ♀ M. Ferrer-Suay det. 2011] (ZSM). Additional specimens (9 ♂♂, 52 ♀♀) AUSTRIA: 1 ♀ [Semmeringgebiet, Reichenan dist., 25 May–6 Jun. 1957, G.E.J. Nixon] (BMNH). CROATIA: 1 ♀ [swept from vegetation by lake, Croatia, Plitvice, 4–10 Aug., Jugoslavia: 1955, R.L. Coe.] (BMNH B.M. 1955-460). CZECH REPUBLIC: 3 ♀♀ [Moravia, Dyje River, near Znojmo, 12 Aug. 91, L. Masner] (CNCI C-263); 1 ♀ [Moravia, Lanzhot-Ranspurk, 7–9Aug. 1991, L. Masner, sweep, climax flood forest] (CNCI C-268); 2 ♀♀ [Moravia, 16 km N Blansko, 8 Aug. 1991, L. Masner, sweep. Tilia-Acer forest] (CNCI C-271); 1 ♂ [Moravia, Lanzhot-Ranspurk, 9–12 Aug. 1991, L. Masner, climax hardwood forest, PT] (CNCI C-270); 1 ♀ [Moravia, Ladnice environs 7–9 Aug. 1991, L. Masner riparian, forest] (CNCI C-272). GERMANY: 3 ♀♀ [Schwarzwald, Todtmoos environs, 6 Aug. 1984, L. Masner, screen sweeping] (CNCI C-235). JAPAN: 1 ♂ [Fukuoka, Mt. Hiko, 700 m, 9–10 May 1989, sweep, M.J. Sharkey] (CNCI C-183); 2 ♀♀ [Hokkaido, Sapporo, Jozankei, 350 m, 20–31 Jul. 1989, K. Maeto and M. Sharkey] (CNCI C-140); 4 ♀♀ [Hokkaido, Sapporo, Jozankei, 350 m, 20–31 Jul. 1989, K. Maeto and M. Sharkey] (CNCI C-151); 2 ♀♀ [Hokkaido, Sapporo, Jozankei, 350 m, Aug. 1989, K. Maeto and M. Sharkey, MT] (CNCI C-203); 1 ♂, 1 ♀ [Hokkaido, Furano Exp. Forest, 43°15′ N, 142°20′ E, 9 Aug. 1996, 500 m, L. Masner, sweep] (CNCI C-162); 3 ♀♀ [Hokkaido, Shibetsu-Rubesu, E. slope of Mt. Shari, 43°45′ N, 144°45′ E, 17 Aug. 1996, 700 m, L. Masner, sweep] (CNCI C-164); 1 ♀ [Hokkaido, Sapporo, Jozankei, 350 m, 20–31 Jul. 1989, MT, K. Maeto and M. Sharkey] (CNCI C-204); 3 ♀♀ [Hokkaido, Sapporo, Jozankei, 350 m, 10– 21 Aug. 1989, K. Maeto and M. Sharkey, MT] (CNCI C-206); 1 ♀ [Hokkaido, Nukabira, 600 m, 5 Jul. 1989, sweep, M.J. Sharkey] (CNCI C-215); 1 ♀ [Hokkaido, Sapporo, Jozankei, 350 m, 29 Aug.–12 Sep. 1989, K. Maeto and M. Sharkey, MT] (CNCI C-207). POLAND: 1 ♀ [Przemysl, 12 Sep. 1984, N.D. Springate: 1 ♀] (BMNH). RUSSIA: 1 ♂, 1 ♀ [Russian Far East, Primorskii Krai Lazovski Zapovednik, c. 170 Km E., Vladivostok, Lazo, 43°30′33″ N, 134°06′59″ E, 1375 m, 2 Jun.–3 Jul. 2001, Mountain top, malaise trap 458, M. Quest coll., Alloxysta sp1., det. M. Forshage 2012] (BMNH B.M. 2009-59); 1 ♀ [Magadanskaya Oblast, Aborigen Field Station, 500 m, 25 Jul.–10 Aug. 1990, D.M. Wood] (CNCI C-298). SLOVAKIA: 1 ♂, 3 ♀♀ [Čachtice environs, 2 Aug. 1991, L. Masner, sweep] (CNCI C-267); Koṧice, 14–17 Sep. 1984, N.D. Springate] (BMNH). SWEDEN: 1 ♀ [Sk. Röstanga, 6 Jul. 1938, D.M.S.P. and J.F.P.] (BMNH B.M. 1938-414); 1 ♀ [Sk. Kivik, 19 Jul. 1938, D.M.S.P and J.F.P.] (BMNH B.M. 1938-414). SWITZERLAND: 3 ♂♂, 9 ♀♀ [Dielsdorf, 650 m, 17 Aug. 1984, L. Masner, sweep] (CNCI C-290); 1 ♂ [Jura, Delémont, CABI Lab., 47°22′42″ N, 7°20′30″ E, 7 Jun. 1999, H. Goulet, spruce/beech] (CNCI C-287); 1 ♀ [Solothurn, Weissenstein, 1225 m, 47°15′10″ N, 7°30′00″ E, 17 Jun. 1999, Goulet/White, lush meadow] (CNCI C-285); 3 ♀♀ [Turgau, Unterwasser environs, 1440 m, 4 Aug. 1984, L. Masner, sweeping] (CNCI C-293). Distribution Holartic. Certain records: Andorra (Ferrer-Suay et al. 2011: 358), Colombia (Ferrer-Suay et al. 2012f: 325), Germany (Hartig 1840: 200; Hübner et al. 2002: 507), Japan (Ferrer-Suay et al. 2013i). Uncertain records: Canada (Vancouver Island) (Andrews 1978: 70), Canada (British Columbia) (Andrews 1978: 56), Canada (Quebec) (Bouchard et al. 1982: 184), France (Kieffer 1902b: 597; De Gaulle 1908: 26), Hungary (Fülöp et al. 2010: 55), Iceland (Andrews 1978: 87), Poland (Kierych 1979b: 15), Romania (Ionescu 1969: 267), Scotland (Cameron 1886: 88), USA (Alaska) (Andrews 1978: 70), USA (Colorado) (Baker 1896: 132,134). New records: Austria, Czech Republic, Croatia, Japan, Poland, Russia, Sweden and Switzerland.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.042 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".