Floricimbex Archibald & Rasnitsyn 2023, n. gen.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Floricimbex n. gen. Fig. 27. Cimbex: Cockerell, 1922, p. 50, placement of C. vetusculus. Type species. Cimbex vetusculus (Cockerell, 1922). Diagnosis. Distinct from all other genera of Cimbicinae by combination of much inflated hind male femur with mid and hind coxae touching basally. Remarks. The genus is attributed to Cimbicinae based on wing venation: 1-M joins R distant from Rs+M, cell 2r plus the pterostigma is distinctly wider than cell 3r, and 2m-cu joins M far before 2r-m. Within Cimbicinae, the genus belongs to a group defined by Vilhelmsen (2019) to include Cimbex Olivier, 1791, Labriocimbex, Odontocimbex Malaise, 1934, and Trichiosoma shojaense Saini & Thind, 1992. This group is characterized in part by their elongate hind coxa and swollen male hind femur. However, unlike these and other large Cimbicinae (Cimbex, Labriocimbex, Leptocimbex, Odontocimbex and Trichiosoma Leach, 1817) its mid and hind coxae approach each other (coxae of these five genera are set distinctly distant leaving a considerable space along thorax midline). Additionally, the new genus differs from Cimbex by the posterior margin of its first abdominal tergum being straight, from Odontocimbex and Trichiosoma in having the hind femur apparently not toothed below (although not all of the lower margin of the hind femur is sufficiently visible), from Labriocimbex and Leptocimbex in much more swollen hind femur. These justify the generic level distinction of Floricimbex. Etymology. From the Florissant locality and genus name Cimbex. The name is to be treated with masculine grammatical gender since it is derived from Cimbex (see Taeger et al. 2010: 188). Species included. Type species only.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".