Bibliographic record
Abstract
328 Euura oehlkei (Muche, 1973) Fig. 107 Pachynematus oehlkei Muche, 1973b: 167–169. Holotype ♀, not found in ZMHB (GBIF-GISHym2786), but the slide preparation of the lancet was located. Type locality: Kazakhstan, Alma-Ata, Medeo. Nematus (Pachynematus) tarani Zhelohovcev, 1976a: 62–63. Holotype ♀ (ZMMU?), not examined. Type locality: Uzbekistan, Fergana District. Synonymized with oehlkei by Muche (1981). Diagnosis The species is very similar to E. annulata and E. gehrsi, and synonymy with one of them cannot be excluded. The lancet of E. oehlkei has a concave or straight ventral margin while it tends to be slightly convex in annulata and gehrsi, but the significance of this difference remains unclear. The drawing of the lancet of tarani (Zhelohovcev 1976a) does fit very well with the lancet of oehlkei. Muche (1973b) and Zhelohovcev (1976a) also described males which are similar to gehrsi in their dark colouration. Muche’s (1973b) drawing of the penis valve does not seem to be entirely accurate, but Zhelohovcev’s (1976a) drawing fits best with gehrsi in overall shape, although the size of the valvispina fits better with annulata. Host plants Unknown. Genetics COI No data. Nuclear No data. Distribution and material examined East Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Kazakhstan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".