MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968976263 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4337977

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) droegei Gibbs 2009

2020· article· en· W6968976263 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrewsterHolotypeBase (topology)Baltica

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) droegei Gibbs, 2009 Fig. 34–35, 93B, 111B, 112B Lasioglossum (Dialictus) droegei Gibbs, 2009b: 387, figs 14a–b (holotype, ♀, deposited at PCYU, examined). Diagnosis Both sexes of Lasioglossum droegei can be recognized by the characters for the Lasioglossum petrellum species complex (below), in addition to the characters given in the keys. They are most similar to L. petrellum (Cockerell, 1903). Females of L. petrellum have T2–4 with less extensive tomentum, and usually metasoma with larger brown to black patches laterally. Males of L. petrellum have the T1–3 apical areas slightly shinier and distinctly punctate. In addition, the distributions of these two species are not known to overlap: L. droegei is only known from the Chihuahuan Desert, while L. petrellum is known from the Sonoran Desert and west coast of California and Baja California. Material examined Holotype UNITED STATES – Texas • ♀; Brewster Co.; 29.1466° N, 103.1876° W; 1 May [2002]; H.W. Ikerd leg.; PCYU. Other material MEXICO – Nuevo Leon • 1 ♀; 3 km SW of Galeana; [24.81° N, 100.1° W]; 1550 m a.s.l.; 19 Mar. 1991; R. Brooks and R. Leschen leg.; SEMC. UNITED STATES – New Mexico • 1 ♂; Eddy Co.; 32.178° N, 104.4877° W; 8 Jun. 2010; A. Druk leg.; BBSL. – Texas • 1 ♀; Brewster Co., Big Bend Natl. Park, Oak Canyon; [29.28° N, 103.33° W]; 1400– 1520 m a.s.l.; 11 Apr. 1986; T. Griswold leg.; ex Penstemon; BBSL • 1 ♀; Brewster Co., Big Bend Natl. Park, Oak Spring; [29.282° N, 103.332° W]; 18 Jun. 1999; S. Droege leg.; BBSL. See also material in Gibbs (2009b). Description Female See Gibbs (2009b) for a complete description and figures of the female. Male COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma blue-green to golden-green; clypeus apical colour black with narrow translucent orange flange; labrum reddish brown to orange; mandible orange with black base and red tip; flagellum black dorsally, orange ventrally; pronotal lobe reddish brown; metasoma black to reddish brown with rims of terga and sterna and downcurved lateral areas of terga narrowly translucent brown to orange; legs metallic green with tibiae and basitarsi black and distitarsi reddish brown; tegula orange; wing membrane hyaline, veins dark brown. PUBESCENCE. Body hair colour white. Tomentum dense on paraocular area, supraclypeal area between antennae, pronotal angle and lobe, and space between pronotal lobe and tegula; sparse on clypeus, gena anteriorly, and metanotum anteriorly. Scutum hair thin. Sterna hair short (0.5–1 OD), moderately plumose, sparse and erect. Wing hairs dark, long and dense. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus punctures moderately dense (i=1–2 pd), sculpture finely reticulate in basal ¾, shiny apically; supraclypeal area punctures sparse (i=1–4 pd), sculpture imbricate; paraocular area punctures dense (i <1 pd), sculpture imbricate; frons punctures crowded (i= 0 pd), indistinct, sculpture reticulate; vertex punctures crowded laterally (i=0 pd), absent medially, sculpture imbricate laterally, rugulose medially; gena punctures moderately dense (i=1–2 pd), sculpture shiny, becoming imbricate and weakly lineate posteriorly and ventrally; postgena sculpture finely reticulate, becoming weakly lineate posteriorly; tegula punctures absent; scutum punctures dense (i <1 pd), sculpture finely reticulate; scutellum punctures dense marginally and on median line (i <1 pd), moderately sparse submedially (i=1–2 pd), sculpture finely reticulate; metanotum sculpture imbricate and densely punctate (i <1 pd); metapostnotum rugae strong, anastomosing, not reaching margin, sculpture finely reticulate; preëpisternum sculpture rugulose; hypoepimeron punctures absent, sculpture finely reticulate; mesepisternum punctures dense (i <1 pd), indistinct, sculpture finely reticulate; metepisternum sculpture lineate dorsally, rugulose ventrally; propodeum lateral face punctures obscure, sculpture finely reticulate; propodeum posterior face sculpture imbricate and densely punctate laterally (i <1 pd), becoming shiny and sparsely punctate medially (i=1–4 pd); T1 anterior face sculpture weakly coriarious; T1 dorsal surface punctures crowded (i=0 pd), becoming dense laterally (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture weakly coriarious, becoming finely reticulate apically; T2 disc punctures crowded (i =0 pd), becoming dense laterally (i ≤ 1 pd), disc sculpture weakly coriarious, becoming finely reticulate apically, rim punctures dense (i <1 pd), rim sculpture finely reticulate. STRUCTURE. Face length/width ratio 0.91. F1:pedicel length ratio 1.29; F2:F1 length ratio 1.55; F2 length/ width ratio 1.7; F9 length/width ratio 1.37. Forewing with 3 submarginal cells; pronotal angle obtuse; tegula shape normal. Intertegular distance 1.08 mm. Scutum length/width ratio 0.88; scutum:scutellum length ratio 2.57; scutellum:metanotum length ratio 1.72; metanotum:metapostnotum length ratio 0.74. Propodeum lateral carinae not reaching dorsal margin; oblique carina absent. (n= 1) GENITALIA. Not examined. Range Chihuahuan Desert from New Mexico and Texas to Nuevo Leon (Fig. 35). Floral records LAMIACEAE Martinov: Hedeoma Pers. H. apiculata W.S. Stewart (G09) • PLANTAGINACEAE Juss. Penstemon Schmidel. DNA barcodes Five sequences available (BOLD process IDs: DLII034-06, DLII035-06, DLII1302-08, DLII1538- 09, LASNA009-08; BIN: BOLD:AAZ1858). Lasioglossum droegei differs from all other western red-tailed L. (Dialictus) by 1 fixed substitution: 303(C). It differs from L. griswoldi, L. petrellum, and L. tuolumnense by an additional 2 fixed substitutions: 117(C) and 228(G) (Supplementary file 4). Remarks Gibbs (2009b) recorded L. droegei from only a single location in Texas. Additional specimens are now known from New Mexico and Nuevo Leon. The male is described here for the first time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207