Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crematogaster Lund ashmeadi Mayr. Accomack, Gloucester, Halifax, Mecklenburg, Newport News, Portsmouth, Southampton, Virginia Beach, York (STDC, VMNH), “ Virginia ” (BMNH, NHMW, USNM, ZMHB). Literature records: Fairfax, Spotsylvania, Virginia Beach (Guenard & Drew 2011, Morgan & Mackay 2017), “ Virginia ” (Mayr 1886, Emery 1895, Smith, M.R. 1965, Smith, D.R. 1979, Johnson 1988, Guenard et al. 2012, Deyrup 2016). cerasi (Fitch). Carroll, Craig, Fairfax, Floyd, Henry, Montgomery, Page, Shenandoah (MMPC, RUIC, USNM, USNPS, VMNH), “ Virginia ” (NMSU). Literature records: Fairfax, Patrick, Spotsylvania, Virginia Beach (Kjar & Barrows 2004, Kjar 2009, Guenard & Drew 2011, Kjar & Park 2016, Morgan & Mackay 2017), “ Virginia ” (Smith, M.R. 1965, Peck et al. 1998, Guenard et al. 2012). laeviuscula Mayr. “ Virginia ” (NMSU). Literature records: Virginia Beach (Guenard & Drew 2011), “ Virginia ” (Mayr 1886, Emery 1895, Peck et al. 1998, Guenard et al. 2012, Morgan & Mackay 2017). lineolata (Say). Albemarle, Alleghany, Buckingham, Carroll, Chesapeake, Dinwiddie, Fairfax, Franklin, Greensville, Halifax, Henry, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Northampton, Patrick, Prince Edward, Prince William, Shenandoah, Suffolk, Sussex, Tazewell, York (FMNH, MCZ, MMPC, RUIC, STDC, UCM, USNM, VMNH), “ Virginia ” (FMNH, MSNG, USNM). Literature records: Augusta, Dinwiddie, Giles, Mecklenburg (Cole 1949, Wang et al. 2000, Morgan & Mackay 2017), “ Virginia ” (Mayr 1886, Emery 1895, Enzmann 1946, Creighton 1950, Gregg 1963, Smith, D.R. 1979, Peck et al. 1998, Revis & Waller 2004, Guenard et al. 2012). pilosa Emery. Accomack, Highland, Lee, Mecklenburg, Northampton, Prince Edward, Poquoson, Roanoke, Scott, Southampton, Surry, Virginia Beach, York (NHMB, STDC, USNM, VMNH), “ Virginia ” (FMNH, USNM). Literature records: Fairfax, Roanoke (Wheeler 1933, Johnson 1988, Kjar & Barrows 2004, Kjar 2009, Kjar & Park 2016), “ Virginia ” (Creighton 1950, Guenard et al. 2012, Morgan & Mackay 2017). * vermiculata Emery. Chesapeake: Northwest River Park and Campground, 36.58633° N, - 76.16529° W, 20 m, 25.iv.2016, JB Keiper leg., ground foragers, mixed mesic forest patch adjacent to a swamp forest; Northwest River Park and Campground, 36.58298° N, - 76.16363° W, 27 m, 25.iv.2016, JB Keiper leg., ground foragers, mixed mesic forest patch adjacent to a swamp forest; Newport News: Newport News Park, 37.17843° N, - 76.54596° W, 27 m, 20.v.2017, K Ivanov leg., KI2774, colony in small rotten branch on ground, mixed forest, urban park with high intensity of deer browse; Newport News Park, 37.17843° N, - 76.54596° W, 27 m, 20.v.2017, K Ivanov leg., KI2776, foragers on Peltandra virginica, wetland area at edge of pond; Southampton: Cypress Bridge Swamp Natural Area Preserve, 36.67637° N, - 77.04638° W, 16 m, 19.vii.2017, K Ivanov leg., KI2827, foraging trail on a well rotten branch on ground, muddy area at river’s bank, bald cypress-water tupelo swamp forest; Cypress Bridge Swamp Natural Area Preserve, 36.67637° N, - 77.04638° W, 16 m, 19.vii.2017, K Ivanov leg., KI2830, Winkler litter extraction, bald cypress-water tupelo swamp forest; Sussex: Chub Sandhills Natural Area Preserve, 36.87172° N, - 77.18721° W, 8.iv.2016, RS Anderson & AV Evans leg., Winkler litter extraction, burned oak-pine litter, area adjacent to bald cypress-water tupelo swamp forest (VMNH). Morgan and Mackay (2017, p. 402) erroneously cite Kjar (2009) as source of Virginia records. Until the present study, no specimens were known from Virginia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.063 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".