MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968999030 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6220725

Cryptochironomus digitatus Malloch

2009· article· en· W6968999030 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaGeorge (robot)BeaverFishingPupa

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cryptochironomus digitatus (Malloch) (Fig. 3 C–G) Material examined. CANADA: British Columbia, Marion Lake, pupal exuviae, 1964, A.L. Hamilton. Lake Winnipeg records: Victoria Beach, 219 males, 9. & 25.vii. 1969; Pine Dock, 6 males, 10. & 31.vii. 1969; 0.5 km off George Island, 10 males, 11.vii. 1969; 3 km off Grand Rapids, 28 males, 13.vii & 4. x. 1969; 10 km off (Sturgeonskin) Long Point, 22 males, 14.vii. 1969; 3 km off McCreary Island, 14 males, 15.vii. 1969; Gull Harbour, 5 males, 1 female, 16.vii. 1969; Gimli Government Wharf, 3 males, 24.vii. 1969; Matheson Island Government Wharf, 1 male, 26.vii. 1969; 3 km off George Island, 46 males 27.vii. 1969; Grand Rapids Government Wharf, 16 males, 28.vii. 1969; 5 km of Selkirk (Horse) Island, 58 males, 29.vii. 1969; McBeth Harbour, 123 males, 7.ix. 1969; 15 km east of Long Point, 1 male, 6.ix. 1969; 20 Mile Creek, 1 male, 1.ix. 1971; Old Fishing Dock, 9males, 21.vii. 1971; Calder’s Dock, 22 males, 6. & 14. vi. 1971; Hecla Island, 10 males, 27. vii. & 11.viii. 1971; Beaver Creek, 1 male, 13.vii. 1971; South Basin, 31 larvae, 4.vi.–31.x. 1969; Narrows, 9 larvae, 4. vi.–31.x. 1969; North Basin, 41 larvae, 1 pupa, 4.vi.–31.x. 1969. The Lake Winnipeg males have an AR of 3.54–4.03, 3.80 (10); a LR1 of 1.23–1.39, 1.30 (10); 9–24, 14(10) sensilla chaeticae on mid leg, none on hind leg; and 24–40, 32(10) setae on squama. A female has 75 sensilla chaeticae on mid leg, 34 on hind leg. Its genitalia are illustrated in Saether (1977b fig. 90 A, B). Pupa (n=1–2, tentatively associated and not reared) Total length 10.34–10.84 mm. Cephalothorax. Cephalic tubercle (Fig. 3 C) 270–285 µm long, 46 µm wide 1/3 from base, 40 µm wide 2/ 3 from base, with or without a 20 µm long frontal seta. Abdomen. T I–V, anterior portion of T VI, S I–V and margins of S VI–VIII with reticulation. Caudal margin of T II with 31–43 hooklets on each side of 90–1601,wide interruption. Pedes spurii A present on S IV–VII, spinules 36–40 µm long on IV, 14–18 µm long on V–VII. Caudal margin of 25 T I–VII respectively with following numbers of spines (lengths in parentheses): 32–56 (20–34 µm), 50–52 (24–30 µm), 17–26 (48–50 µm), 15–29 (32–50 µm), 18–25 (50 µm), 21 (42–52 µm), 17–43 (30–36 µm). Caudal margins of S I– VII respectively with following numbers of spines (lengths in parentheses): 27–60 (35–38 µm), 12–17 (20–30 µm), 21–28 (40–50 µm), 15–26 (20–38 µm), 7–30 (24–28µm), 0–38 (0–34 µm), 0–26 (0–18 µm). Caudomedian projection of anal lobe 282–442 µm long, 276–313 µm wide; with 88–130 µm, long, 22 µm wide branches. Genital sac of male with 54–74 µm long, 44–54 µm wide apical point. Fringe of anal lobe with 99–106 filaments. Fourth instar larva (n = 9–10, except when otherwise stated, tentatively associated) Total length 7.99–12.67, 10.04 mm. Head capsule length 0.66–0.77, 0.71 mm (23). Head. Antenna as in Fig. 3 D. Lengths of antenna] segments (in µm): 82–98, 90; 28–35, 32; 16–20, 19; 2– 4, 2; 2–4, 4. AR 1.41–1.72, 1.56. Basal antennal segment 35–39, 37µm wide; 2.45–3.29, 2.80 times as long as second segment; ring organ 50–70, 62 µm from base. Style of second segment 10–12, 11 µm long. Labrum (Fig. 3 E) with 35–40, 38 µm(8) long labral sensilla; S I 26–42, 33 µm (6); S II 50 –60, 54 µm (4) long. Premandible 148–180, 160 µm long. Mandible (Fig. 3 F) 190–220, 210 µm long; with 43–55, 50 µm apical tooth which is 0.20–0.26, 0.24 times as long as mandible. Basal segment of maxillary palp 58–76, 70 µm long; 26–30, 28 µm wide. Median tooth of mentum (Fig. 3 G) including darker lateral accessory teeth 62–68, 65 µm wide. Ventromental plate 190–220, 201 µm wide; 50–60, 57 µm long; 3.28–3.80, 3.51 times as wide as long. Postmentum 250–308, 267 µm long. Abdomen. Procercus 42–52, 49 µm high; 39–46, 43 µm wide; with 552–761, 677 µm long anal setae. Supraanal seta 330–435, 400 µm (7); supraanal seta/anal setae 0.57–0.70, 0.61(7). Anal tubules triangular 192–250, 222 µm (5) long; 100–130, 112 µm (5) wide at base. Posterior parapods 368–515, 436 µm long. Third instar larva Head capsule length 0.40–0.48, 0.44 mm (44) (See Fig.) Second instar larva Head capsule length 0.26–0.29, 0.28 mm (5) (See Fig.) Distribution and ecology. The species was previously known from Yukon to New Foundland and south to California, New Mexico, Texas and Florida (Townes 1945:100, Sublette and Sublette 1965:167, Oliver et al. 1990: 44, Epler 2009). Mozley (1975: 102, 104) found the species in the sandy littoral (down to 8 m) in Lake Michigan. This and other observations indicate that C. digitatus has an ecology conforming to that of other numbers of the Harnischia -complex living in the sandy littoral of large lakes and rivers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→