Gyrophaena (Gyrophaena) gilvicollis Casey 1906
Bibliographic record
Abstract
19. <i>Gyrophaena</i> (<i>Gyrophaena</i>) <i>gilvicollis</i> Casey Figs 18, 118–124; Map 15 <i>Gyrophaena</i> (<i>Gyrophaena</i>) <i>gilvicollis</i> Casey, 1906, 296; Seevers 1951: 709; Moore and Legner 1975: 429; Campbell and Davies 1991: 106 [cited doubtfully from Ontario with no locality records from Canada]. <b>Description.</b> Body length 1.8–2.2 mm, narrowly elongate; head piceous to black; pronotum flavate; elytra piceous to black with testaceous humeri and irregular small spots dispersed posteriorly; abdomen flavate, apical part of abdomen darker. Punctation: vertex of head with about 10 large umbilicate punctures on each side, pronotum with a few dispersed large punctures, elytra with fine and sparse punctures. Microsculpture: reticulate throughout except for pronotum, strongest on head. Antennae as illustrated (Fig. <b>Map Ι5.</b> Collection localities in New Brunswick, Canada of <i>Gyrophaena givicollis</i> 18). Pronotum 1.2 times as wide as long. MALE: tergite 8 with two short medio-lateral lobes and two small median teeth, occasionally reduced to small tuberosities or absent, apical margin of disc emarginated medially (Fig. 120); sternite 8 emarginate apically (Fig. 121). Median lobe of aedeagus with elongate tubus bearing two short baso-ventral projections near crista apicalis (Fig. 118), flagellum projecting externally, sinuate in shape (Fig. 118). Paramere as illustrated (Fig. 119). FEMALE. Tergite 8 truncate apically (Fig. 123); sternite 8 rounded apically (Fig. 124); spermatheca as illustrated (Fig. 122). <b>Bionomics. Macrohabitat:</b> mixed forest, hardwood forest, on ridge with red oak in silver maple forest, oak and red maple forest, and spruce forest. <b>Microhabitat:</b> on/in gilled mushrooms on forest floor, on decaying fleshy mushroom (one adult). <b>Collecting period:</b> August and September. <b>Collecting method:</b> sifting mushrooms and aspirating specimens. <b>Distribution</b> (Map 15). CANADA: <b>New Brunswick</b>; UNITED STATES: District of Columbia, Indiana, Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".