MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6969020233 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7894829

Cenocimbicinae Archibald & Rasnitsyn 2023, n. subfam.

2023· article· en· W6969020233 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulcusSubfamilyMargin (machine learning)Comparative anatomyAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subfamily Cenocimbicinae n. subfam. http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: FA885793-D7D8-49A8-A00D-6C813ACBFC0F Type genus. Cenocimbex Nel, 2004. Diagnosis. Distinguished from all other Cimbicidae by forewing with 2r-m distinctly curved, meeting M distal of 2m-cu; cell 2r+pterostigma distinctly higher than cell 3r; and a combination of the following: eyes converging ventrally; antenna with 7–9 antennomeres, club 3-segmented; mesonotum with median longitudinal mesonotal sulcus and notauli distinct; metanotum short, with cenchri oval; tibial spur acute, long; first abdominal tergite with hind margin straight or weakly emarginated. Remarks. Cenocimbicinae differ from individual subfamilies of Cimbicidae by: from all by 2r-m as in diagnosis; from Abiinae, Cimbicinae by eyes converging ventrally [Cimbicinae: more or less parallel; Abiinae: converging dorsally], by at least one tibial spur acute, long (equal length of first tarsomere, one known, see F-774, tentative Leptostigma brevilatum) [Abiinae, Cimbicinae: blunt]; from Corynidinae, Pachylostictinae by 2r-m posterior insertion distal to cell 2mcu [Corynidinae, Pachylostictinae: proximal to], by cell 2r+pterostigma distinctly higher than cell 3r [not so], antenna with more than five antennomeres [five], club 3-segmented [non-segmented], metanotum short [long]; further from Corynidinae by mesonotum with median longitudinal mesonotal sulcus and notauli distinct [reduced or absent]; from some Abiinae and Cimbicinae by cenchri oval, from some Cimbicinae also by first abdominal tergite with hind margin straight or weakly emarginated [deeply emarginated]. Attribution of the Cenocimbicinae to the Tenthredinoidea is confident by 1-M meeting R and 2r-rs meeting Rs distally to 2r-m, and to the Cimbicidae by their clubbed antenna, and a unique forewing venation characteristic of the core cimbicid subfamilies Cimbicinae and Abiinae and found nowhere else in Hymenoptera: venation complete for Hymenoptera (except Sc, Rs between Rs+M and 1r-rs, and Rs bifurcation lost), characteristically narrow (low) cell 3r, and 2r-m crossvein meets M distal to 2m-cu. The long, curved to strongly curved crossvein 2r-m is distinct, occurring only rarely in extant Cimbicidae (very few Abiinae, cf. Vilhelmsen 2019, Fig. 16A; and Cimbicinae, cf. Vilhelmsen 2019, Fig. 16B) and in the Miocene of China (Abiinae: cf. Zhang et al. 1994, Fig. 121; Cimbicinae: cf. Zhang et al. 1994, Fig. 118), which we consider convergent. The new subfamily comprises the oldest known Cimbicidae, from the Selandian of Menat and less than ten million years later in the Ypresian Okanagan Highlands deposits of far-western North America (Archibald et al. 2011), a rather narrow interval of time but across a great distance of the Holarctic. Genera included. The type genus, Allenbycimbex n. gen. and Leptostigma n. gen. Locality and age. Menat, France, Selandian; Okanagan Highlands (McAbee,Allenby Formation, and Republic), far-western North America, Ypresian.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMarine Biology and Ecology Research→French-language works237,207→