MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969083413 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6209898

Procladius (Holotanypus) sublettei Roback

2010· article· en· W6969083413 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuoyBeaverFishingGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Procladius (Holotanypus) sublettei Roback (Figs 6 C–G; 12 F, L; 13 E, G, J, M; 14 H) Procladius (Procladius) sublettei Roback, 1971: 191; Roback 1980: 47; Saether 1977: 48. Procladius culiciformis auct. nec Linnaeus. Material examined. CANADA: Manitoba, Lake Winnipeg, light traps: Victoria Beach, 4 males, 9. & 25.vii. 1969; Pine Dock, 22 males, 10.vii., 31.vii. & 2.ix. 1969; 0.5 km off George Island, 1 male, 12.vii. 1969; 10 km off (Sturgeonskin point) Long Point, 7 males, 14.vii. 1969; 3 km off McCreary Island, 12 males, 15.vii. 1969; Gull Harbor, 2 males, 16.vii. 1969; Grand Rapids Government Wharf, 6 males, 28.vii. 1969; 5 km off Selkirk (Horse) Island, 1 male, 29.vii. 1969; McBeth Harbor, 1 male, 7.ix. 1969; Gimli Government Wharf, 5 males, 9.ix. 1969; Beaver Point, 2 males, 30.vi. & 6.viii. 1971; 20 Mile Creek, 14 males, 26.viii. & 1.ix. 1971; Old Fishing Dock, 8 males, 29.vi., 18.viii. & 8.ix. 1971; Calder's Dock, 1 male, 31.viii. 1971; Hecla Island, 15 males, 25.viii. 1971; emergence traps: Beaver Creek, 23 males, 3.vi.–28.vii.1971; rearings: north of outer buoy Red River, 1 male, 4.vi. 1969; eastsoutheast of outer buoy Red River, 1 male, 1 female, 9.vii.1969; north of outer buoy Red River, 2 males, 9.vii. 1969; 13 km southwest of Bigstone Point, 1 male, 11.vii. 1969; Saskatchewan River Buoy, 1 male, 14.vii. 1969; 10 km east-southeast of Pearson Reef, 1 male, 26.vii. 1969; Pigeon Bay, 1 male, 27.vii. 1969; east of Selkirk Island, 1 male, 4.ix. 1969; 1 km west of Elk Island, 1 male, 4.x.1969; South Basin, 379 larvae, female reared from larva, 4.vi–31.x.1969; Narrows, 105 larvae, 4.vi–31.x.1969; North Basin, 226 larvae, 2 pupae, 4.vi–31.x.1969. The male gonostylus (Fig. 6 G) appear to be closest to the Pt. Pelee, Ontario, population figured by Roback (1971 fig. 376, 379) with some specimens falling in P. sublettei var. grandis. As indicated by Roback (1971: 193) the typical form and the variety may only represent different generations. The female have no setae on anepisternum II, about 16–18 setae on segment X, and about 3–10 sensilla chaetica on ta1 of p2 and p3. Pupa (n = 6) Cephalothorax. Thoracic horn (Fig. 12 F) 380–491, 433 µm long; 112–170, 143 µm wide, atrial wall of thoracic horn with reticulate pattern. Plastron plate diameter 90–144, 114 µm; apical constriction of horn chamber 46– 81, 63 µm wide length/width of horn 2.67–3.39, 3.10; width of plastron plate /width of horn 0.66–1.03, 0.78; width of plastron plate/width of constriction 1.38–2.57, 1.87. Abdomen. Spinules on T IV small, grouped (Fig. 12 N). Anal lobe (Fig. 12 L) with 36–40, 38 spines on outer margin, densely grouped posterolaterally, usually one at apex of inner margin, and apical spines relatively small and set off from remaining spines. Fourth instar larva (n = 10, except when otherwise stated) Head capsule length 720–908, 812 µm (672). Head. Antenna as in Fig. 13 E, G. Lengths of antennal segments (in µm): 165–205, 190; 18–24, 21; 6–8, 7; 2– 3, 3; 1–2, 2. AR 5.50–6.85, 6.14)[4.44–5.50 in Roback (1980)]. Basal antennal segment 32–42, 38 µm wide; 4.46– 5.56, 4.97 times as long as wide; ring organ 0.65–0.79, 0.72 from base; blade 24–33, 29 µm; accessory blade 20– 26, 22 µm long. Apical style of second segment 6–8, 7 µm long. Apex of labrum as in Fig. 13 J. Mandible 174– 202, 191 µm long [148–185 µm in Roback (1980)]. Maxilla about as in P. denticulatus (Fig. 14 C). Maxillary palp (Fig.14 H) 46–58, 48 µm long; 17–21, 19 µm wide; 2.35–2.71, 2.51 times as long as wide. Length of basal antennal segment/length of palp 3.37–4.46, 3.96. Hypopharyngeal pecten (Fig. 13 M) with 13–14, 13 teeth. Abdomen. Claws of posterior parapods all relatively long and slender. Distribution. The species, when including the varieties, is known from all over USA and Canada (Roback 1971: 192–195; Oliver et al. 1990: 15; Spies 1999; Epler 2003, 2010; Caldwell 2009). It is, however, more common in southern parts. The distribution in Lake Winnipeg is shown in Fig. 1, the emergence pattern in Fig. 11.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207