Bibliographic record
Abstract
Blattisocius tarsalis (Berlese) Lasioseius (Lasioseius) tarsalis Berlese, 1918: 134. Typhlodromus tineivorus Oudemans, 1929: 34. Blattisocius triodons Keegan, 1944: 181; Garman, 1948: 18. Lasioseius similis Schweizer, 1949: 49. Blattisocius tineivorus.— Nesbitt, 1951: 51; Womersley, 1954: 184. Melichares (Blattisocius) tarsalis.— Evans, 1958: 209; Athias-Henriot, 1959: 162; Athias-Henriot, 1961: 460; Hughes, 1961: 235. Blattisocius tarsalis.— Schweizer, 1961: 132; Chant, 1963: 298 –300; Lindquist & Evans, 1965: 48; McGraw & Farrier, 1969: 59; Hughes, 1976: 325; Haines, 1978: 20; Domrow, 1979: 98; Halliday et al., 1998: 19. Material examined: Piracicaba - 1 female, 21.xii.1998, from soil of a patch of secondary forest; 1 female, 21.xii.1998, from litter of a patch of rubber tree plantation. Previous records: Australia (Domrow 1979; Halliday et al. 1998), Algeria (Athias-Henriot 1959, 1961), Brazil (Reis & Paschoal 1968; Flechtmann 1981), England (Hughes 1961, 1976; Haines 1979), Italy (Berlese 1918), Germany (Hase 1933; Westerboer & Bernhard 1963), Sweden (Sellnick 1958), Switzerland (Schweizer 1949, 1961), Russia (Bregetova 1977), continental USA and Canada (Chant 1963; McGraw & Farrier 1969), Hawaiian Islands (Garret & Haramoto 1967). Treat (1975) and Farrier & Hennessey (1993) cite other references with records of this species from Canada, Hawaiian Islands, continental USA and Europe. Diagnosis: Chelicerae of female with fixed digit reduced, less than half length of movable digit; fixed digit without teeth, and with pilus dentilis inserted at distal extremity; movable digit with three teeth (not ‘edentate’ as stated in key to species by Halliday et. al 1998). Peritreme reduced in length, extending to posterior margins of coxa II. Female sternal shield lacking endopodal extensions between coxae II–III, and with 3 pairs of setae; metasternal seta inserted in soft cuticle; lacking sclerotized endopodal strips between coxae II and III, III and IV. Female ventri-anal shield subrectangular, narrow, longer than wide, with three pairs of opisthogastric setae in addition to the circum-anal setae. Male sternogenital shield with posterior extremity constricted, tongue-shaped, leaving genital seta free on soft cuticle. Remarks: This species had been previously reported in Brazil only from stored products (Reis & Paschoal 1968; Flechtmann 1981). Extensive descriptions of its biology and behavior, with records of feeding on eggs, larvae, and occasionally adults of moths are given by Treat (1975) and Hughes (1976), and its potential use as a predator of insect pests of stored food products was discussed by Lindquist (1983). Records of a similar predatory association with bark beetles have been cited by McGraw & Farrier (1969).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".