MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969129751 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5626708

Camallanus oxycephalus Ward & Magath 1917

2016· article· en· W6969129751 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGubernaculumGroove (engineering)Buccal administrationDorsumCapsule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

** Camallanus oxycephalus Ward & Magath, 1917 Description (after Stromberg et al. 1973). With characteristics of the genus. Slender worms, widest in middle third of body and tapering slightly towards tail. Living worms red in colour. Cuticle with barely perceptible striae. Head straight, not bent ventrally. Mouth opening elongate. Buccal capsule divided into two sclerotized lateral valves with smooth longitudinal rib-like thickenings internally; inflation of valves forms sclerotized ring at junction of buccal cavity and oesophagus. Two trident-shaped processes at junction of valves, one dorsal, one ventral (Fig. 40 A). Three pairs of simple circumoral papillae in outer circle; two pairs in inner circle at dorsal and ventral ends of mouth opening. Oesophagus with anterior club-shaped muscular portion, and posterior cylindrical glandular portion. Intestine straight. Anal lips slightly protruding. Males: 4.57 (4.43–5.20) long; width 0.15 (0.12–0.18). Buccal capsule 0.103 (0.096–0.112) by 0.100 (0.096– 0.107). Tridents 0.094 (0.086–0.104) long. Muscular oesophagus 0.390 (0.360–0.422), and glandular oesophagus 0.461 (0.428–0.530) long. Nerve ring 0.168–0.210 from anterior end. Single testis reaching almost to glandular oesophagus, then reflexed; reproductive tract with several swollen portions separated by constrictions. Tail 0.121 (0.109–0.136) long, rolled ventrally in mature worms, ending bluntly without a mucron. Thin caudal alae supported by papillae. Six pairs pre-cloacal, five pairs post-cloacal papillae. Spicules unequal but similar, left one weakly sclerotized, right one heavily so, 0.154 (0.146–0.166) long. Gubernaculum absent (Fig. 40 B). Females: 18.18 (15.93–25.05) long. Buccal capsule 0.137 (0.128–0.142) by 0.151 (0.136–0.165). Tridents 0.138 (0.134–0.144) long. Muscular oesophagus 0.569 (0.483–0.666), glandular oesophagus 0.652 (0.558–0.748) long. Nerve ring 0.262 (0.222–0.300) from anterior end. Vulva 2.24–3.11 from tail tip, lips slightly protruding. Vagina very muscular, directed posteriorly. Single ovary reaching level of muscular oesophagus, then reflexing; posterior branch of uterus reaching tail end, ending blindly in an highly muscular sac. Tail 1.87 (1.53–2.21) long, bluntly rounded without mucron (Fig. 40 C). Ovoviviparous: larvae 0.635 (0.629–0.645) long. Site: intestine Hosts: Ambloplites rupestris (1, 2, 7); Ameiurus nebulosus (4); Ammocrypta pellucida (1); Aplodinotus grunniens (1, 9); Carpiodes cyprinus (4, 9); Catostomus commersonii (3, 6); Cottus bairdii (3); Culaea inconstans (3); Cyprinella spiloptera (1); Esox lucius (7); Etheostoma blennioides (1); Etheostoma exile (3, 7); Fundulus diaphanus (7); Hiodon tergisus (1); Ictalurus punctatus (1); Labidesthes sicculus (1); Lepomis gibbosus (1, 7); Lepomis macrochirus (7); Lota lota (3); Micropterus dolomieu (1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11); Micropterus salmoides (1); Morone chrysops (1, 2, 9); Notemigonus crysoleucas (7, 12); Notropis atherinoides (1); Notropis buccatus (1); Notropis heterodon (1); Notropis heterolepis (1); Notropis hudsonius (1); Notropis stramineus (1); Noturus flavus (1); Oncorhynchus kisutch (7); Perca flavescens (1, 3, 9); Percina caprodes (1, 3, 7); Percina copelandi (1); Percina maculata (1); Percopsis omiscomaycus (1); Pomoxis nigromaculatus (1, 2, 7); Rhinichthys cataractae (1); Salmo salar (5); Sander canadensis (1, 3); Sander vitreus (1, 9) Distribution: Nova Scotia, Ontario Records: 1. Bangham & Hunter 1939 (ON); 2. Bangham 1955 (ON); 3. Dechtiar 1972a (ON); 4. Dechtiar 1972 b (ON); 5. Hare & Frantsi 1974 (NS); 6. Chan 1980 (ON); 7. Dechtiar & Christie 1988 (ON); 8. Dechtiar & Lawrie 1988 (ON); 9. Dechtiar & Nepszy 1988 (ON); 10. Dechtiar et al. 1988 (ON); 11. Dechtiar et al. 1989 (ON); 12. Forest & Cone 2011 (ON)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyFrench-language works237,207