MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969150956 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5317234

Platyhydnobius validus Peck & Cook 2009, new combination

2009· article· en· W6969150956 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCollembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeAedeagusDorsumBasal (medicine)Apex (geometry)Ridge

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Platyhydnobius validus (Brown, 1932b), new combination (Figs. 148, 149–155) Hydnobius validus Brown, 1932b: 202. Type material. Hydnobius validus, holotype, male, in CNCI; bearing white label “Thunder Riv. / Que. 27.VIII.1930 / W.J. Brown ”; and red label “ HOLOTYPE / Hydnobius / validus / 3223 No. / Brown”; seen and dissected. Type locality: PQ: Thunder River [Rivière-au-Tonnerre]. Additional material examined. We examined 38 specimens (See Appendix). Diagnosis. Body yellowish to reddish brown, shining. Length of pronotum + elytra = 3.3–4.2 mm (males), 3.7–4.4 mm (females). Head finely, densely punctate; transverse groove at level of posterior margins of eyes. Pronotum widest at basal two-fifths, sides obtusely rounded at basal two-fifths, basal angles obtuse; ratio length:width = 1:1.6; moderately coarsely punctate, without microsculpture. Elytra wider than pronotum, ratio length:width = 1:0.8; with 9 regular, closely punctate striae; striae 6 and 7 do not reach apex; stria 8 does not reach base; stria 1 weakly impressed; intervals finely, irregularly punctate. Antennal club (Fig. 149) broad, ratio club width:length = 1:2.1; width ratio of antennomeres 7:8:9 = 1.6:1:1.9. Mandibles (Fig. 150) moderately elongate with a thin plate forming inner margin of apical one-half. Male profemur unarmed; male mesofemur (Fig. 151) with tooth on apical one-third of posterior margin; male metafemur (Fig. 152) with narrow tooth on apical one-third of posterior margin; all femora unarmed in female. Protibia in both sexes broad at apex with broad depression on apical two-fifths of dorsal surface, outer margin spinose; mesotibia and metatibia of both sexes widened apically, outer margins spinose. Male. Aedeagus (Fig. 153) with median lobe broad, evenly tapered apically. Parameres inserted at basal one-fifth of median lobe, longer than median lobe, broad, flat, lobed laterally near base. Paramere apices thin, with two setae dorsally before apex and several setae at apex. Female. Coxites (Fig. 155) elongate, moderately broad, narrowing apically; small styli inserted at apices of coxites. Sternite 8 (Fig. 154) broadly rounded apically; anterior apophysis moderately broad, apex rounded. Distribution. The species occurs in northern North America from central Alaska to Quebec and down the Rocky Mountains to New Mexico (Fig. 148). We have seen specimens from Canada: the provinces of Alberta, Manitoba, Quebec and Yukon Territory; USA: the states of Alaska and New Mexico. Field notes and habitats. Habitat data are few. Adults were collected in flight intercept traps in spruce–willow and aspen thickets along streams, and eleven specimens in rotary traps at Matanuska, Alaska. Seasonality. Adults have been collected from June to August with most specimens in July.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicCollembola Taxonomy and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207