MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969155651 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6568083

Rhogeessa innoxius Thomas 1903

2019· article· en· W6969155651 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Innovations and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRostrumSkullSubspeciesDorsumCusp (singularity)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

213. Thomas's Yellow Bat Rhogeessa io French: Rhogeessa de Thomas / German: Thomas-Gelbfledermaus / Spanish: Rogesa de Thomas Other common names: Southern Little Yellow Bat Taxonomy. Rhogeessa io Thomas, 1903, “Valencia [Carabobo], Venezuela.” Previously considered a race of R. parvula, based on external and skull morphology; later included in R. tumida based on bacular, external and skull morphology; subsequently returned to full species status based on karyological studies. Overits wide distribution, this species probably includes additional subspecies or even species yet to be described; one south Central American specimen showed considerable genetic distance from Venezuelan and Trinidadian populations, indicating that they may correspond to different species; a taxonomic review is needed. Monotypic. Distribution. C & SE Nicaragua S to N & W Colombia, NW Ecuador, Venezuela, and patchily in Guyana, Amazonian Brazil, and Bolivia; also San Andrés, Providencia, Trinidad, and Tobago Is. Descriptive notes. Head—body 37-50 mm, tail 29-33 mm, ear 11-13 mm, hindfoot 5-8 mm, forearm 27- 6-32 mm; weight 3-6 g. Dorsal fur is bicolored, with whitish to grayish-yellow bases and cinnamon tips; ventral fur is tawny olive with paler bases. Ears blackish and triangular; tragus long. Eyes small, and face triangular. Wing membranes blackish brown and naked; uropatagium almost naked, sparsely furred only until knee. Skull short (greatest skull length less than 12- 6 mm) and broad; rostrum broad and flattened; braincase broad and low, with low but distinct sagittal crest; zygomatic arches broad and spread wide; helmet absent. I? has distinct secondary cusp near tip; molariform teeth relatively broad and heavy; palate broad. Chromosomal complement has 2n = 30. Habitat. Wide variety of habitats, including evergreen and deciduous forest, thorn scrub, open areas and villages, occupying almost every vegetation zone at elevations from sea level to 1500 m. Commonly found in slightly disturbed deciduous forests. Food and Feeding. Insectivorous, feeding on small flying insects that are captured on hunting routes along trails, roads, streams and wells, and clearings, often close to ground. Analyses of fecal samples from Venezuela showed that 100% of their volume was composed by coleopterans, mainly Scarabaeidae. Breeding. Pregnant females were captured from February to April, lactating females from March to July, and flying juveniles from May to August. The scarce information available indicates that litter size is two. Activity patterns. Nocturnal; this fast-flying bat initiates foraging activity right after sunset. Two peaks of activity, one in first hour of evening, and other in last hour before dawn. Roosts found in palm fronds, hollow trees, between boards, under thatched roofs and other human buildings. Echolocation search-phase calls have durations of 2:1-3-8 milliseconds, with maximum frequencies of 95-111 kHz and minimum frequencies of 33-42 kHz. Frequency at maximum energy 48-2-57-7 kHz. Movements, Home range and Social organization. This species can roost in fairly large colonies; recorded roosting in a church tower along with Bonda Mastiff Bats (Molossus currentium), Sinaloan Mastiff Bats (M. sinaloae), Argentine Serotines (Eptesicus furinalis), long-tongued bats (Glossophaga sp.), Common Black Myotis (Myotis nigricans), and Lesser Bulldog Bats (Noctilio albiventris). Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. Widely distributed, with expected large population. It occurs in several protected areas. Bibliography. Baird, Hillis et al. (2008), Baird, Marchan-Rivadeneira et al. (2012), Bianconi & Pedro (2017), Bickham & Ruedas (2008), Dolan & Carter (1979), Emmons & Feer (1997), Genoways & Baker (1996b), Goodwin (1958b), Goodwin & Greenhall (1961), LaVal (1973a), Oria & Machado (2007), Pio et al. (2010), Simmons (2005), Soriano & Tavares (2016).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAgricultural Innovations and PracticesFrench-language works237,207