Republicopteron douseae Archibald & Gu & Mathewes 2022, new species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Republicopteron douseae new species (Figs. 5–7) Diagnosis. As for genus. Description. Holotype tegmen. As in diagnosis and the following. Darkly infuscate throughout wherever preserved (darkness differing among specimens presumably by preservation) with some light spots between veins, crossveins as in P. maculata, but not as many or as distinct (perhaps preservation?). ScP with eight accessory branches preserved, surely more in missing basal region; no stridulatory file detected on CuPb. Type specimens. Holotype. SR 00-04-06 part, no counterpart (Fig. 5), a well-preserved anterior basal-mid region of a tegmen, precostal region not preserved, with a fragmentary portion of a second wing closely associated and a beetle preserved between fragments; deposited in SR; collected by Cassie Douse at Republic locality B4131, May 1, 2000, labelled: Holotype, Republicopteron douseae Archibald, Gu, and Mathewes. Paratype 1: SRUI 09- 95 - 73, (Fig. 6), collected by Michael Santino at Republic exposure A0307, April 19, 2009; labelled Republicopteron douseae Archibald, Gu, and Mathewes Paratype 1. Paratype 2: SR 21-005-001, (Fig. 7), collected by Gregg Wilson at Republic exposure B4131, May 14, 2014; labelled Republicopteron douseae Archibald, Gu, and Mathewes Paratype 2. Locality and age. Republic, Washington, USA; Tom Thumb Tuff Member of the Klondike Mountain Formation exposures B4131, 51.18 0.09 Ma. old and A0307, 51.45 0.12 Ma. old, mid Ypresian. Etymology. The specific epithet is a patronym formed from the surname of Cassie Douse, collector and donor of the holotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".