Land r/o 3 Pilgrims Row, Westmill, Buntingford, Hertfordshire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to investigate the archaeological potential of a proposed new residential development located on land at the rear of 3 Pilgrims Row, Westmill, Buntingford, Hertfordshire, the Heritage Network was commissioned by the developer to undertake a programme of targeted trial trenching. A single trench was excavated across the footprint of the proposed new dwelling, which revealed a large degree of disturbance in the form of post-medieval and modern activity. Layers of overburden lay directly over the natural and a modern drain and soakaway had impacted into the natural.Two parallel ditches running across the trench at right angles and aligned north-west to south-east were revealed cutting into the natural. Their fills contained charcoal flecks but no finds were discovered. The investigation demonstrated that the area for the proposed development has seen a degree of disturbance from at least the post-medieval period onward. Whilst the ditches were undatable, a study of the existing housing plot layout in Westmill combined with the results of the evaluation suggests that these may relate to property boundaries. On the basis of the results of the evaluation, the risks that the proposed development might disturb archaeological remains of any local significance may be considered to be Low-Moderate for the medieval period and Low for all other periods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.065 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".