Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lycoriella lundstromi (Frey, 1948) Selected literature. Bradysia (Chaetosciara) lundströmi Frey [correctly lundstromi]— Frey (1948): 60, 80, plate 12, fig. 69. Lycoriella (Lycoriella) lundstroemi (Frey) [correctly lundstromi]— Tuomikoski (1960): 81, 87, fig. 20g. Lycoriella lundstroemi (Frey) [correctly lundstromi]— Hackman 1963: 26; Gerbachevskaja (1969): 340; Gerbachevskaja (1988): 516. Lycoriella (Lycoriella) lundstromi (Frey) — Gerbachevskaja-Pavluchenko (1986): 33; Freeman (1983): 31, fig. 103; Menzel et al. (1990): 342; Menzel & Mohrig (2000): 385, 398, 611; Salmela & Vilkamaa (2005): 291; Menzel et al. (2006): 113; Vilkamaa et al. (2007): 228; Kolcsár & Heller (2019): 294. Lycoriella lundstromi (Frey) — Heller et al. (2009): 42; Vilkamaa & Menzel (2019): 52. Material studied. USA, Alaska, 11 mi S Anderson Jct, Rte 3, mi 270, forest (alder, poplar, spruce), Malaise trap, 23.VI–11.VIII.1984, S. & J. Peck, 1 male (in MZH, http://id.luomus.fi/GE.1803). BIN. BOLD:ACC1227. Remarks. New for the Nearctic region. On BOLD, there are currently registered 50 specimens with four public BINs: 5 with the ID code BOLD:ACC1227 (Germany, Finland), 35 specimens with BOLD:ACG8695 (Canada, Finland), 9 with BOLD:ACG4621 (Belarus, Germany, Norway), and one single female in poor condition from Bulgaria with BOLD:ACP4988 (not verifiable without a male). Certainly, there may be more species in their morphology very similar to Lycoriella lundstromi (Frey), lacking the intergonocoxal lobe or seta groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".