Bibliographic record
Abstract
23. Ixodes auritulus Neumann, 1904. Australasian: 1) Australia, 2) New Zealand; Nearctic: 1) Canada, 2) USA; Neotropical: 1) Argentina, 2) Brazil, 3) Chile, 4) Colombia, 5) Costa Rica, 6) Ecuador, 7) Guatemala, 8) Panama, 9) Peru, 10) Uruguay, 11) Venezuela; remote islands: 1) Pacific Ocean Islands (south) of Chatham and Antipodes (Arthur 1960b, Wilson 1967 a, Roberts 1970, Jones et al. 1972, Keirans & Clifford 1978, González et al. 2005, Heath et al. 2011, Lindquist et al. 2016, Cicuttin et al. 2017, Carvalho et al. 2020, Guglielmone et al. 2020, 2021). Records of Ixodes auritulus from South Pacific islands are based on Heath et al. (2011) and are named Ixodes auritulus zealandicus, most probably a species in itself (see note below). Camicas et al. (1998, under the name Scaphixodes auritulus) and Guglielmone et al. (2014) listed this species as found in the Afrotropical Region, but records from that region have not been confirmed and the Afrotropics are excluded from the range of Ixodes auritulus (Guglielmone et al. 2020, 2021). There are also controversial records of Ixodes auritulus from the Antarctic Peninsula and South Atlantic and Indian Ocean islands that are not included in the range of this tick. Kolonin (2009) and Castrezana (2010) included Papua New Guinea and Mexico, respectively, within the range of Ixodes auritulus; however, the presence of this tick in those countries has not been confirmed, and Mexico and Papua New Guinea are provisionally excluded from its range. Arthur (1960b), González-Acuña et al. (2005), Guglielmone et al. (2020, 2021) and others treated Ixodes auritulus as a name for a species complex, an opinion also endorsed here. Note: the literature review for this monograph was completed on March 31, 2022. Subsequently, Apanaskevich et al. (Zootaxa, 5173, 1-73; August 5, 2022) confirmed that the name Ixodes auritulus has historically been applied to a species complex containing at least nine taxa distributed in the Australasian, Nearctic and Neotropical Zoogeographic Regions. However, these taxa are not discussed here.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".