MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969355340 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5626727

Rhabdochona catostomi Kayton, Kritsky & Tobias 1979

2016· article· en· W6969355340 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicdental development and anomalies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcretory systemSpiculeDiverticulum (mollusc)Cuticle (hair)Body cavity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhabdochona catostomi Kayton, Kritsky & Tobias, 1979 Description (after Kayton et al. 1979). With characteristics of the genus. Body filiform, males smaller than females. Caudal end conical with terminal spike. Mouth with two bilateral rudimentary pseudolabia, two large bilateral amphids, outer circle of cephalic papillae (inner circle apparently absent). Prostom funnel-shaped, lacking basal teeth, its inner wall with 10 longitudinal cuticular ridges terminating in anterior teeth. Cuticle lines entire vestibule. Oesophagus with anterior muscular and wider posterior glandular regions. Deirids small, bifurcate, lying slightly anterior to mid-vestibule. Males: body 8.9–14.3 long, 0.173–0.211 maximum width. Prostom 0.022–0.034, vestibule 0.134–0.174, muscular oesophagus 0.336–0.372, and glandular oesophagus 3.5–4.8 long. Deirids 0.076–0.085, nerve ring 0.204–0.238, and excretory pore 0.484 from anterior end. Tail 0.336–0.392 long, curved ventrally. Caudal alae absent. Subventral caudal papillae variable in number, 8 or 9 pre-cloacal, and 5 post-cloacal pairs (Fig. 44 A). Left spicule 0.546–0.562 long, slender, with ventral groove, its tip with ventral barb, bifurcate. Right spicule 0.151– 0.154 long, with reflected distal barb (Fig. 44 B). Length ratio of right to left spicule 1:3.62 to 1:3.65. Females: body 15.3–16.7 long, 0.248–0.292 maximum width. Prostom 0.028–0.031, vestibule 0.154–0.176, muscular oesophagus 0.375–0.417, and glandular oesophagus 4.97–6.10 long. Deirids 0.090–0.097 and nerve ring 0.227–0.284 from anterior end [position of excretory pore not stated]. Tail 0.227–0.280 long, usually straight (Fig. 44 C). Vulva post-equatorial comprising a transverse slit surrounded by elevated labia. Mature eggs ellipsoidal, embryonated, “poles usually with complex elongate filaments”, measuring 0.031–0.036 x 0.020–0.024 (Fig. 44 D). Site: intestine Host: Catostomus catostomus Distribution: Alberta Record: Kayton et al. 1979

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicdental development and anomaliesFrench-language works237,207