Land Adjacent to 34C Kneesworth Street Archaeological Evaluation Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to determine the archaeological risk posed by a proposal to construct new housing on land adjacent to 34C Kneesworth Street, Royston, Herts, the Heritage Network was commissioned by the owner to undertake a programme of archaeological evaluation. The site lies at the edge of AAS10, which defines the extent of the medieval settlement of Royston. Part of King James' Palace, a Royal hunting lodge of King James I, survives at No. 23 Kneesworth Street. One 10 x 1.6m trench was excavated across the proposed development footprint. The trench was cut east-west across the slope of the ground and varied in depth from 0.8m to 1.8m The exposed stratigraphy suggests that there had been considerable landscaping of the plot, the natural chalk having been terraced and all the levels subsequently restored. The client also excavated a 1.3 x 0.6m test pit 3m west of the trial trench. At this point the natural chalk was observed at a depth of approximately 0.9m below the surface. Three possible construction layers, consisting of a thick band of redeposited chalk between thin layers of coarse sand, were observed in the northern and western sections of the trench, their location may coincide with the route of an earlier garden path.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".