An Archaeological Landscape Survey of Sheffield Park Gardens, East Sussex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The survey area in Sheffield Park covered the majority of the two military camps which accommodated parts of the 3rd and 4th Canadian Infantry Divisions. The Fletching Camp was primarily the home to three of the four Batteries of the 5th Anti-Tank Regiment, of the 4th Division. The Lewes Road Camp appears to have been the home of the 12th Field Regiment RCA, of the 3rd Division. The Survey has identified significant elements of the Fletching Camp, also it has established there are areas to the south which still exist. The eastern boundary of the camp has not been firmly established and likely lies beyond the survey area. It is recommended that the survey be extended to record the remaining elements of the camp. Elements of the Lewes Road Camp were identified along the south-western shore of Lower Woman's Pond. More elements of this camp exist eastwards, beyond the current survey, and it is recommended that the survey be extended. The aim of the survey in Walk Wood was to identify what remains of the original 17th/18th century Ornamental Walks as part of a National Trust project to restore and open these to the public. Sections of four of these original walks were identified, but later replanting and the use of brash to mark out the paths means most are either hidden from view or have been lost. Those that have been identified should be incorporated into the new public walkways and the survey extended once clearing operations have commenced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".