Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scutellonema brachyurum (Fig. 2 F–H) Measurements. See Table 3. Remarks. Scutellonema brachyurum was described from red spiderlily (Lycoris radiata) in Hamlet, Richmond County, NC, and was also documented in SC (Kraus-Schmidt & Lewis 1979). CABI (2006) recorded S. brachyurum in six countries in Europe, 11 in Asia, 15 in Africa, two in North America (Canada, USA including Arkansas, California, Florida, NC, SC), four in Central America and the Caribbean, four in South America, and five in Oceania. A series of studies on the host range of S. brachyurum in South Africa was carried out from 1988 to 2001 (Waele & Jordaan 1988a; 1988b; Bolton et al. 1989; Jordaan et al. 1992; Venter et al. 1992; Fourie et al. 2001). Tarjan (1964a) reported it on bermudagrass in Egypt. Agudelo & Harshman (2011) first found it on lilyturf (Liriope muscari) in SC. In the present study, S. brachyurum was found only in Beaufort County, SC, in samples from a bermudagrass putting green. The morphology and morphometrics of the identified population did not differ from other populations (Siddiqi 1974b). Stylet length 45.3 ± 0.9 47.5 ± 3.0 39.5 50.1 ± 2.6 41.5 46.5 ± 1.5 (44.0–46.0) (45.0–55.0) (48.0–56.0) (45.0–49.0) Stylet cone 27.0 ± 2.2 28.3 ± 3.5 20.5 29.0 ± 1.6 22.5 26.3 ± 1.1 length (24.0–29.0) (26.0–37.0) (27.0–32.0) (25.0–28.0)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".