Questions et réponses pour Atelier 2023: La bilharziose génitale chez la femme (BGF)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<strong>Questions et réponses pour Atelier 2023: La bilharziose génitale chez la femme (BGF) </strong> L<strong>'</strong>Atelier 2023 : La bilharziose génitale chez la femme (BGF) s'est déroulée en ligne du 4 au 19 mai 2023. L'atelier a été mené par Bridges to Development en partenariat avec La Fondation Apprendre Genève et avec le soutien du End Fund. Plus de 200 professionnels de la santé d'Afrique subsaharienne y ont participé. Ils ont été formés à pour améliorer leurs compétences au niveau, du diagnostic et du traitement de la BGF. Les questions présentées dans ce document ont été formulées par les participants à l'atelier. L'équipe d'experts en la matière qui a soutenu la formation a fourni les réponses. Il s'agit d'un document évolutif, qui fait l'objet de mises à jour et de révisions. Pour votre référence, lisez la version 1 élaborée le 19 mai 2023. Bridges to Development apporte une expertise sujet et des partenariats, avec une équipe qui a des décennies d'expérience en matière de collaborations internationales. Depuis 2021, Bridges travaille en partenariat avec la Fondation Apprendre Genève, utilisant "l'approche Scholar", un ensemble unique d'interventions recherchées, développées et mises en œuvre par la Fondation pour soutenir l'apprentissage par les pairs. <strong>Questions and answers for Workshop 2023: Female genital schistosomiasis (FGS)</strong> Workshop 2023: Female Genital Schistosomiasis (FGS) took place online from May 4 to 19, 2023. The workshop was conducted by Bridges to Development in partnership with The Geneva Learning Foundation and with the support of the End Fund. Over 200 healthcare professionals from sub-Saharan Africa took part. They were trained to improve their skills in diagnosing and treating FGS. The questions presented in this document were formulated by workshop participants. The team of subject matter experts who supported the training provided the answers. This is a living document, subject to updates and revisions. For your reference, read version 1 developed on May 19, 2023. Bridges to Development brings subject matter expertise and partnerships with others around the world, reflected in a team that brings decades of experience with international collaborations. Since 2021, Bridges has worked in partnership with The Geneva Learning Foundation, using the “Scholar approach”, the unique package interventions researched, developed, and implemented by the Foundation to support peer learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.055 | 0.234 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".