İngilizce ve Fransızca süreli yayınlarda milli mücadele döneminde Uşak
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, an evaluation was made by following the news that took place in the British press of the period, the process of saving Uşak from the occupation during the National Struggle Period. The aim of the study is to determine the attitude of the British press in the process of liberating Uşak and its surroundings from the Greek occupation, and to determine the information that can contribute to the literature. The study was mainly based on the English press. In addition, some other foreign press organs were also included. Fort he study, comparative method was used. The news in the English press was compared with the news in the domestic press and finally an evaluation was made. The news that took place in English newspapers between 25 August and 15 September 1922 were evaluated. The following media organs were primarily discussed in the research: Daily Mirror, Western Morning News, Sheffield Daily Telegraph, Dundee Courier, Nottingham Journal, Pall Mall Gazette, Northern Whig, Western Evening Herald, Westminster Gazette, The Scotsman, Aberdeen Press and Journal, Army and Journal. Navy Gazette, Londonderry Sentinel, Sunday Post, Halifax Evening Courier, Forward (Glasgow), Sheffield Independent, Belfast Telegraph, Shields Daily News, Western Chronicle, Freeman’s Journal, Illustrated London News, Birmingham Daily Gazette, Hull Daily Mail, Newcastle Journal, Leeds Mercury, The New York Times, The Daily Telegraph, Chicago Tribune, The Guardian, New York Tribune, The Los Angeles Time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".