Aricidea (Strelzovia) albatrossae Pettibone 1957
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aricidea (Strelzovia) albatrossae Pettibone, 1957 Aricidea (Aricidea) albatrossae Pettibone, 1957: 354 –356, fig. 1 Aricidea (Allia) albatrossae.— Strelzov 1973: 68 –71, fig. 26; Hartley 1981: 136, fig. 1; Hartmann-Schröder 1996: 381. Aedicira albatrossae.— Day 1973: 93 –92. Material examined. 2230 Oseberg C OSC15; 60.6117°N–2.7784°E; 113 m; 21.05.2001; one specimen. 6244 Oseberg C OSC–15; 60.6122°N–2.7801°E; 104 m; 28.05.2013; one specimen. 6244 Regionale stasjoner REG–07; 60.9730°N–2.6305°E; 187 m; 30.05.2013; two specimens. 6244 Regionale stasjoner REG–13; 60.8214°N– 2.8519°E; 175 m; 29.05.2013; two specimens. Diagnosis. Antenna short, not reaching first chaetiger; club-shaped. Secondary ciliary organs present. Three prebranchial segments; dorsal parapodial lobes of chaetiger 1 similar in length to those of remaining prebranchial chaetiger. Branchiae numbering up to 30 pairs; relatively thin, cylindrical and gradually tapering. Modified notochaetae absent. Neuropodial capillaries clearly thicker than notopodial ones. Modified neurochaetae as gradually tapering, terminal spine as continuation of tip or absent. Distribution. North Atlantic: western coast near North Carolina (Pettibone 1957; Day 1973) and eastern coast, near Norway (Hartley 1981). Canadian Arctic (Conlan et al. 2008). Northern California (Strelzov 1973). Chilean Patagonia (Montiel et al. 2002). Southern Brazil (Prantoni et al. 2013)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".