Goetheana rabelaisi S. Triapitsyn 2005, sp. n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Goetheana rabelaisi sp. n. Figs 1–3 Etymology: Continuing A.A. Girault’s trend to name some taxa after the great poets and writers of the past (particularly in this genus), I am naming this new species after François Rabelais. Diagnosis: Male scape moderately swollen (1.8–2.0 x as long as wide). Forewing with numerous setae behind marginal vein arranged in about 4 irregular rows (Fig. 2), that distinguishes this species from C. pushkini sp. n. Description: Female. Unknown. Male (holotype and 2 paratypes). Colour (of slide-mounted specimens) of head and mesosoma brown, metasoma yellow or brownish-yellow, appendages light brown. Antenna (Fig. 1) with scape moderately swollen, 1.8–2.0 x as long as wide; flagellum with F1 longer than wide. Mesosoma smooth except midlobe of mesoscutum with faint cellulate sculpture. Forewing (Fig. 2) about 5 x as long as wide; longest marginal setae 2.0–2.2 x maximal forewing width; disc slightly infumated and with about 4 irregular rows of setae behind venation, otherwise bare except for a few scattered setae along margins in the broadest part (beyond venation). Hind wing narrow, about 13 x as long as wide; disc bare except for an irregular row of setae along each margin. Genitalia as in Fig. 3. Measurements (n=1, holotype): Body: 738. Antenna: scape: 94; pedicel: 55; F1: 21; F2: 28; clava: 62. Forewing: 455/91; longest marginal seta: 191. Hind wing: 394/30; longest marginal seta: 139. Genitalia: 86. Holotype: Male on slide, labelled: 1. “ AUSTRALIA: Australian Capital Territory, Canberra, Black Mountain, 9.iv.1995, L. A. Mound, Collector’s code: 2639. On Exocarpus cupressiformis in association with Anaphothrips exocarpi. Mounted at UCR/ERM by V.V. Berezovskiy 2004 in Canada balsam”; 2. (red) “ Goetheana rabelaisi S. Triapitsyn HOLOTYPE ơ” [ANIC]. Paratypes: Same data as the holotype, 2ơ on slides [ANIC, UCRC]. Hosts: Anaphothrips exocarpi Pitkin (according to the original label). Comments: The type series of this species was remounted in Canada balsam at UCRC from Hoyer’s medium on a single slide, on which all three specimens had been mounted originally under the same coverslip together with a female of Stethynium sp. (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae). The original labels were as follows (now glued onto the bottom of the paratype slide retained at UCRC): 1. “ Exocarpus cupressiformis in association with Anaphothrips exocarpi A.C.T. Canberra Black Mt. 9.iv.1995 LA Mound 2639”; 2. “n. sp.? Goetheana (Eulophidae) x 3ơ Mymaridae x 1 = Stethynium sp. ^ Det. S. Triapitsyn 1999 Hoyer’s”. The holotype is in a very good condition but missing one of the hind wings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".