MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969557815 · doi:10.5284/1125077

Archaeological findings in the south range of Exeter Cathedral cloisters, 2013

2012· article· en· W6969557815 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Architecture and Urbanism
Canadian institutionsLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloisterButtressExcavationCarpentryStairsTrenchHeraldry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During building work archaeological recording was carried out through two small trench excavations and stnading building recording including access to newly exposed areas where modern partitions and boarding were removed. Report details all findings and includes an appendix of documentary research. "Observations were made when building work was undertaken in the south cloister range of Exeter Cathedral. One medieval buttress foundation was exposed, allowing a reconstruction of the layout of the bays of the 15th-century south cloister walk to be confirmed. The serge market built on the site in 1657 replicated the bay rhythm of the medieval walk; one of its posts was found to sit on the buttress foundation. New evidence for the character of the market was found, including the construction and layout of its upper floor, its paving, and the form of its frontage where some high-quality carpentry detail was exposed. The main beams were of pine - a significant early use of this wood. The sequence of alterations to the market is now much better understood. On the first floor, the eastern bay was evidently separated from the adjacent rooms soon after the market was built; fragments of a late 17th- or early 18th-century timber-framed partition mark the division. More radical changes are attributable to remodelling in 1796-7, when a grand new stair well was installed within the market building to serve the rebuilt Second Canon's House, which backed on to the south enclosure wall of the cloister. Evidence for a previously unknown secondary staircase of this date was found, and the date and form of the walls around the main staircase were established. Appendices present a detailed account of the documentary evidence relating to the south cloister walk and Church House, and newly discovered photographic evidence relating to this group of buildings."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.951

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it