MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969560208 · doi:10.5683/sp3/hdexqw

Total mercury, methylmercury, nitrogen, carbon, hydrogen, and sulfur concentrations in a degrading lithalsa field near Kangiqsualujjuaq (Nunavik, Canada)

2025· dataset· en· W6969560208 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermokarstPermafrostMethylmercurySulfurMercury (programming language)Total organic carbonOrganic matterHydrology (agriculture)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset contains the data used for the scientific article " Methylmercury concentrations in a degrading lithalsa field: effects of thermokarst development and revegetation", submitted to Science of the Total Environment (Cardinal et al., 2025, submitted). Samples were collected in September 2022 from a degrading lithalsa field at the margin of Tasialuk Lake, Kangiqsualujjuaq, Nunavik, Canada. The dataset includes analyses of soil total mercury (THg), methylmercury (MeHg), nitrogen (N), carbon (C), hydrogen (H), sulfur (S), loss on ignition, grain size distribution, and key environmental variables associated with the soil samples. Additionally, surface water samples from thermokarst ponds were analyzed for filtered and unfiltered THg and MeHg. Soil samples were collected at depths of 10, 20 and 30 cm from different geomorphic units, including degrading lithalsas, rim ridges, and thermokarst ponds at various stages of revegetation. Vertical profiles were also collected from a lithalsa (390 cm deep, with permafrost from 115–390 cm), a revegetated thermokarst pond (60 cm deep), and a rim ridge (90 cm deep). Recorded environmental parameters include water table depth, thaw depth, wetness, and organic matter thickness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealisFrench-language works237,207