MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6969567235 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6274634

Seeversiella

2003· article· en· W6969567235 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtist diversity and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaWingApex (geometry)Key (lock)Coelom

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key for identification of species of Seeversiella 1 Elytra longer or only a little shorter than pronotum. Pronotal length to elytral length (measured from humeral angle) ratio 1.1 or less ......................................................... 2 – Elytra much shorter than pronotum (Figs. 18­19). Pronotal length to elytral length (measured from humeral angle) ratio more than 1.1 ................................................. 28 2 Pronotum glossy, with weak isodiametric microsculpture or without microsculpture 3 – Pronotum matte, with strong isodiametric microsculpture ....................................... 25 3 Punctation of pronotum asperate. Tergum 8 with three pairs of macrosetae (Figs. 222, 224). Proximal seta of the apex of paramere is approximately as long as the other three setae (Fig. 233). Aedeagus: Figs. 226­233. Spermatheca: Fig. 234. Body length 2.6­3.0 mm, pronotal width 0.53­0.56 mm. Known from Cerro Punta, Panama, at altitude of 2100 m (Fig. 388) .............................. 16. S. brevipennis Gusarov, sp. n. – Punctation of pronotum not asperate. Tergum 8 with four pairs of macrosetae (Figs. 20, 22). Proximal seta of the apex of paramere is much longer than the other three setae (Fig. 33)............................................................................................................... 4 4 Pronotum with weak isodiametric microsculpture ...................................................... 5 – Pronotum without microsculpture ............................................................................. 23 5 Males ............................................................................................................................ 6 – Females (Females of S. nigriceps are unknown) ........................................................ 15 6 Distal sclerites of internal sac strongly sclerotized, hook­shaped (Figs. 31, 35; 48, 51; DS) or dentiform (Figs. 63, 65; DS) 7 – Distal sclerites of internal sac poorly sclerotized, not hook­shaped or dentiform and may have numerous spicules (Figs. 87; 99, 101; 124; 146; DS) ............................... 10 7 Distal sclerites of internal sac hook­shaped (Figs. 31, 35; 48, 51) ............................. 8 – Distal sclerites of internal sac dentiform (Figs. 63, 65; 124) ...................................... 9 8 Body dark brown. Microsculpture on head and pronotum less distinct. Apex of median lobe in lateral view straight (Figs. 26­27). Copulatory piece of internal sac long (Figs. 29, 34). Elytra (measured from humeral angle) longer than pronotum. Wings fully developed, 4 times as long as elytra. Aedeagus: Figs. 24­31, 33­36. Body length 2.4­3.3 mm, pronotal width 0.44­0.54 mm. Widespread in North America, known from Canada to Honduras (Figs. 385­387) .................................................. ...............................................................................1. S. globicollis (Bernhauer) (males) – Body brown. Microsculpture on head and pronotum more distinct. Apex of median lobe in lateral view bent paramerally (Figs. 43­44). Copulatory piece of internal sac short (Figs. 46, 49­50). Elytra (measured from humeral angle) shorter than pronotum. Wings short, 2 times as long as elytra. Aedeagus: Figs. 41­52. Body length 2.5­2.8 mm, pronotal width 0.44­0.49 mm. Known from the Guadalupe Mountains, Texas, at altitude of 2400 m (Fig. 386) ............................... 2. S. texana Gusarov, sp. n. (males) 9 Distal sclerites of internal sac wider (Figs. 63, 65). Aedeagus: Figs. 58­61, 63­67. Body length 2.3­2.8 mm, pronotal width 0.40­0.44 mm. Known from the Huachuca Mountains, Arizona, at altitude of 2150 m (Fig. 386) ................................................... ........................................................ 3. S. sonomotoides Gusarov, sp. n. (males, in part) – Distal sclerites of internal sac narrower (Fig. 124). Aedeagus: Figs. 119­125. Body length 2.4 mm, pronotal width 0.47 mm. Known from Mexico, at altitude of 2400 m (Fig. 387)...............................................8. S. nigriceps Gusarov, sp. n. (males, in part) 10 Apex of median lobe in lateral view widened subapically (Figs. 112­113; 156­157) 11 – Apex of median lobe in lateral view not widened subapically (Figs. 85­86) ............. 14 11 Apex of median lobe in lateral view emarginate on parameral side (Figs. 156­157). Aedeagus: Figs. 154­159. Body length 2.5 mm, pronotal width 0.50­0.53 mm. Known from El Salvador, at altitude of 2100 m (Fig. 387) ........................................... ................................................................................11. S. badia Gusarov, sp. n. (males) – Apex of median lobe in lateral view may be slightly bent paramerally (Figs. 141­142) but never clearly emarginate (Figs. 112­113; 141­142) ............................................ 12 12 Apex of median lobe in parameral view wide (Figs. 110­111). Aedeagus: Figs. 110­ 115. Body length 2.4 mm, pronotal width 0.49 mm. Known from Mexico, at altitude of 1300 m (Fig. 387) ............................... 7. S. tuberculicauda Gusarov, sp. n. (males) – Apex of median lobe in parameral view narrow (Figs. 139­140; 165­166) .............. 13 13 Apex of median lobe in parameral view with weak basal constriction (Figs. 139­140). Aedeagus: Figs. 139­148. Body length 2.2­2.8 mm, pronotal width 0.41­0.53 mm. Known from Mexico, at altitudes of 1700­2300 m (Fig. 387) ....................................... ........................................................................ 10. S. mexicana Gusarov, sp. n. (males) – Apex of median lobe in parameral view gradually widened basally, not constricted (Figs. 165­166). Aedeagus: Figs. 165­173. Body length 2.3­2.8 mm, pronotal width 0.48­0.54 mm. Known from Honduras, at altitude of 2000­2100 m (Fig. 387) ............ ............................................................................. 12. S. similis Gusarov, sp. n. (males) 14 Distal sclerites of internal sac have weak spicules (Fig. 87). Aedeagus: Figs. 83­88. Body length 2.3­2.5 mm, pronotal width 0.46­0.50 mm. Known from Mexico, at altitude of 1700­1900 m (Fig. 387) ............................. 5. S. fusca Gusarov, sp. n. (males) – Distal sclerites of internal sac have strong spicules (Figs. 99, 101). Aedeagus: Figs. 94­103. Body length 2.3­2.8 mm, pronotal width 0.46­0.50 mm. Known from Mexico and Honduras, at altitude of 1500­2400 m (Fig. 387) ............................................................................................................................6. S. castanea Gusarov, sp. n. (males) 15 Spermatheca S­shaped (Figs. 149, 160) .................................................................... 16 – Spermatheca L­, J­ or C­shaped (Figs. 32, 53, 62, 89, 104) ....................................... 18 16 Umbilicus facing proximally (Fig. 149). Body length 2.2­2.8 mm, pronotal width 0.41­0.53 mm. Known from Mexico, at altitudes of 1700­2300 m (Fig. 387) ............. ..................................................................... 10. S. mexicana Gusarov, sp. n. (females) – Umbilicus facing laterally (Figs. 160, 174). Two closely related species which cannot be distinguished by females ....................................................................................... 17 17 Body length 2.5 mm, pronotal width 0.50­0.53 mm. Spermatheca: Fig. 160. Known from El Salvador, at altitude of 2100 m (Fig. 387) .....................................................................................................................................11. S. badia Gusarov, sp. n. (females)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0810.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicProtist diversity and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207