MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6974047425 · doi:10.57903/uj/k3qdys

Local pO2 study in murine tumors

2023· dataset· en· W6974047425 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRepozytorium Otwartych Danych Badawczych Uczelni Krakowskich - Uniwersytet Jagielloński · 2023
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSalineIn vivoUltrasoundRandomized controlled trialRadiation therapyIntraperitoneal injection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Before ITPP treatment, animals were randomized into two groups (ITPP or Saline). In one set of experiments (4T1 tumors, mice injected with 3 ITPP doses), animals were additionally randomized based on preliminary pO2 level in the tumor, to equalize normoxic and hypoxic tumors population. Four different protocols of ITPP treatments were studied. 4T1 tumors were subjected to either 3 (8, 12 and 16 days after tumor inoculation, 1.5 g/kg, IP) or 4 (8, 9, 15, 16 days after tumor inoculation, 1.5 g/kg, IP) doses of ITPP. B16F10 tumors were treated with 6 ITPP injections on either 5, 6, 11, 12, 17, 18 or 5, 6, 12, 13, 19, 20 days after tumor inoculation, all as an intraperitoneal dose of 2 g/kg. These treatment protocols were designed based on earlier results by Tran et al. and pilot experiments. The treatment schedules were adjusted to the tumor growth rate. Mice were randomized into two groups based on ITPP or saline (control, vehicle for ITPP) administration for each protocol: 4T1 tumors treated with 3ITPP doses: N=10 for ITPP and N=10 for control; 4 ITPP doses protocol N=10 for ITPP group and N=9 for saline-treated animals; for B16F10 tumors received six doses at day 5,6,11,12,17,18 there were N=11 for ITPP and N=7 for the control group; second 6 dose protocol (injections at day 5,6,12,13,19,20) has N=6 for ITPP group and N=5 for saline-treated animals. In vivo EPR measurements were conducted at L-band (Bruker Elexsys-II E540, Germany) CW EPR spectrometer using a surface coil (Bruker, Germany). A high-resolution ultrasound (US) imaging system designed for small experimental animals (Visual Sonics Vevo 2100, Canada) with an MS-550D transducer with a center operating frequency of 22–55 MHz was used for ultrasound measurements of 4T1 tumors. To better understand ITPP effects on tissue oxygenation, tumors were classified based on local pO2 values before treatment as normoxic (>10 mmHg) or hypoxic (<10 mmHg). Additionally, to investigate changes in tumor oxygenation during the experimental time, each local pO2 value for the selected time point was classified as normoxic (N) and hypoxic (H).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepozytorium Otwartych Danych Badawczych Uczelni Krakowskich - Uniwersytet JagiellońskiFrench-language works237,207