Phillips, Barry J.: my Army recollections (March 7, 2012)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: First I started my interview with the date and the person that I was interviewing, in this case Barry Phillips. After, I asked his permission to record the interview and I asked him to give me a basic introduction about himself and his military career. Following that, we moved on to the Yugoslav war. Lcol Phillips gave me a brief introduction about the beginning of the war, and he told me that he was deployed in Yugoslavia as part of a Canadian UN Logistics Battalion. He continued the interview in telling me about the UN rules of engagement, followed by the events from the Medak Pocket. He carried on by telling me about the everyday life in Yugoslavia, and the times he was fired upon . I carried on my interview by asking him about the relationship of the Canadian soldiers with the different ethnics of Yugoslavia and I also asked him about the mine removal operations. Later he told me about the disagreements between Canadian and the French UN forces and at the end of the interview I asked Lcol Phillips how was the life after he returned to Canada. Follow this synopsis with a short time log of the interview, including time codes and a single sentence describing individual topics that were discussed. 0:00-6:00 - Military as a family tradition 6:00-16:47 - Beginning of Yugoslavian War 16:47-21:00 - Rules of engagement in UN 21:00-25:01 - Medak Pocket and rules of engagement 25:01-29:06 - Everyday-life as a UN soldier 29:06-42:02 - Fired upon two times 42:02-51:05 - Used civilians as translators 51:05-54:09 - relation with the civilians 54:04-1:00:04 - mine removal missions in Bosnia 1:00:41-1 :09:16 - bad collaboration between Canadian and French UN forces. 1:09:41-1:17:56 - last days in Yugoslavia, and life back in Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".